If I recall correctly, Glam was married before Prop 8 was enacted, so she was never not married.
Lorne: Take care of yourself and ah, make sure fluffy is getting enough love. Gunn: Did he have anything? Fred: No. And who's fluffy? Are you fluffy? Gunn: He called me fluffy? Fred: He said make sure…wait. You don't think he was referring to anything of mine that's fluffy, do you? Because that would just be inappropriate.
'Conviction (1)'
Natter 71: Someone is wrong on the Internet
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Tom Scola - Jun 26, 2013 6:23:29 am PDT #27241 of 30001
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.
tommyrot - Jun 26, 2013 6:28:34 am PDT #27242 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Prop 8 didn't invalidate existing marriages, right?
sumi - Jun 26, 2013 6:30:58 am PDT #27243 of 30001
Art Crawl!!!
Wow.
Okay so if you were gay married and you lived in a state that bans it - you could still get the federal married person tax break but not be allowed to visit your spouse in the hospital?
I can't help but think that the Deen case/story totally shows the problems with SCOTUS' arguements for knocking down that key provision of the Voting Rights Act.
sumi - Jun 26, 2013 6:39:12 am PDT #27244 of 30001
Art Crawl!!!
Strix - Jun 26, 2013 6:44:30 am PDT #27245 of 30001
A dress should be tight enough to show you're a woman but loose enough to flee from zombies. — Ginger
Ok, please tell me I am not the only one who had context problems with the first half of this sentence.
Er...I just re-read that. My focus today is NONE.
Jesse - Jun 26, 2013 6:45:57 am PDT #27246 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I can't help but think that the Deen case/story totally shows the problems with SCOTUS' arguements for knocking down that key provision of the Voting Rights Act.
Or the fact that they immediately implemented a voter ID law in Texas that had been rejected by the Feds?
msbelle - Jun 26, 2013 6:51:36 am PDT #27247 of 30001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
I may be wrong, but I think the redistricting in TX might be worse than the ID law.
I hope some people stage multiple day flash mobs at centers to get IDs.
Jesse - Jun 26, 2013 6:54:25 am PDT #27248 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Redistricting is tricky, I think.
Edit: I mean, conceptually, I don't know anything about what's going on in TX.
tommyrot - Jun 26, 2013 6:55:45 am PDT #27249 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
They are redistricting the fuck out of Texas.
Tom Scola - Jun 26, 2013 7:01:21 am PDT #27250 of 30001
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.
For example, Austin, TX, is split across five or six congressional districts, so that Democrats can't get a majority in any of them.