"The Ninth Circuit was without jurisdiciton to consider the appeal. The judgment of the Ninth Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction."
'Shindig'
Natter 71: Someone is wrong on the Internet
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
"The Ninth Circuit was without jurisdiciton to consider the appeal. The judgment of the Ninth Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction."
I'm sorry to be so dense, but I don't know what that means. Prop. 8 is unconstitutional? Or still stands? Or something otherwise different?
They have basically said that the supporters of Prop 8 who brought the case shouldn't have been allowed to do so. Basically, it will go back to things the way they stood before Perry.
ETA: So, no ruling on the constitutionality (or not) of Prop 8 from the Supremes.
From Twitter:
"#NOH8 BREAKING: #SCOTUS dismisses #Prop8 on grounds proponents lack standing; freedom to marry to return to California! #time4marriage"
Happy Marriage Equality America!
Basically, it will go back to things the way they stood before Perry.
Which means Prop. 8 is unconstitutional? (Sorry to be such a moron.)
MSNBC says marriage is now legal in CA again.
That's fantastic. I declare this to be a day of high drama.
I am totally earwormed with the Bad Romance tune but the lyrics "DO-MA, DO-MA-MA". OY!
Which means Prop. 8 is unconstitutional?
The lower court's decision striking it down stands. Not the same as the Supremes saying it is unconstitutional. So, outcome limited to CA.