Oh dear, Tom and Lorenzo are right! Most of those outfits are not so good.
Because girls are taught not to get dirty and playing on the floor is dirty?
Hmm, I doubt that. My guess would be that it has more to do with what kinds of imaginary play (or not) are going along with the blocks. Like floor play tends to get expansive and involve cites or roads that connect everyone's separate structures, whereas table play is more contained and usually just a couple kids building one thing together. Not sure how gender fits in there, however.
Pretty sure Batman is prepared for that. He has kryptonite, just in case Superman goes evil. Or, I don't know, just to fuck with Superman.
My money is on Leia.
I know Bats is tormented and whatnot from seeing his parents die bloody in an alley, but Leia watched her a dude kill not only her parents and her entire planet without giving up the info,
HE TURNED OUT TO BE HER DAD
(Spoiler-fonted because it amuses me to spoiler-font Star Wars.)
She once strangled a guy with a chain for dressing her as a hooker and licking her once or twice. I woulndn't screw with Leia.
for dressing her as a hooker and licking her once or twice
I don't think we saw the same movie.
Princess Leia--formidable. Batman, despite all evidence, written as indomitable. Mostly Batman trumps Batman. External opponents, less often than you might think.
But could Batman use the force? It's hinted that Leia possibly could.
Obviously, Batman doesn't need The Force.
But what if Vader force-chokes him? Would Batman have to invent a Midichlorian-pesticide?
If Batman is in a force-chokehold, he still has time to reach into his utility belt and throw a batarang. Can Vader use the Force offensively and defensively at the same time?
But what if Vader force-chokes him?
If Batman is not concerned with super strength, heat vision, ice breath, flying opponents, etc, the force? Come on. The force couldn't kill a Robin. And we know what their lifespans are like.
I love us so much. That is all.
