I know! It's like it's stuck and can't quite dump a ton of snow but can't quite stop.
GO HOME, WINTER. YOU'RE DRUNK.
Cordelia: You're him. You're Angel's son. Connor: It's not like I got to choose.
'Hell Bound'
Natter 71: Someone is wrong on the Internet
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Steph L. - Mar 26, 2013 5:46:00 am PDT #16058 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine
SuziQ - Mar 26, 2013 5:56:27 am PDT #16059 of 30001
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame
Sleep last night was maybe an hour. Work is eatting me from the bottom up. I kept having waking dreams of MS Project. And I have an ob/gyn appt this morning about Mirena again. Bleh. Don't wanna go but I have to do a consult before they will actually do it.
§ ita § - Mar 26, 2013 6:00:33 am PDT #16060 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
For some reason IT is fighting back hard on providing templates for documents and communication. We're being tasked to make sure all the information is in said body, and I just don't get what's the downside to a template, or at least a checklist. If "past examples" are such great guidance, why not strip the variables out of one such Platonic ideal so that it's easier for us to tell what "all the information" is?
The first shop I worked in that took PM and SDLC seriously had three basic definitions of projects, and each type of project required different documents at each gate (and if you didn't intend to create a document, you needed a project exec to sign off on that call), and each document had a template. It was really easy to skim and make sure at a cursory level you're even ready to sit down and inspect, or find out who you need to send back to the kitchen. If you have to read all of everything to know that, some omissions are going to be discovered later, natch.
Sparky1 - Mar 26, 2013 6:11:06 am PDT #16061 of 30001
Librarian Warlord
Tweet from SCOTUSblog:
SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog 2m Breaking: key vote Kennedy VERY uncomfortable striking down #prop8. Suggests dismissing case. Would leave in place 9th Cir pro-#ssm ruling.
SuziQ - Mar 26, 2013 6:14:10 am PDT #16062 of 30001
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame
pro-#ssm ruling
? Translation?
DebetEsse - Mar 26, 2013 6:15:40 am PDT #16063 of 30001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
pro-same-sex-marriage ruling (i.e.--the current lower court opinion is that Prop 8 should be struck down)
Steph L. - Mar 26, 2013 6:16:44 am PDT #16064 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine
So, if SCOTUS dismissed the case, the lower-court opinion (that strikes down Prop. 8) would stand? Or would it have to be re-tried in a lower court?
Sparky1 - Mar 26, 2013 6:17:28 am PDT #16065 of 30001
Librarian Warlord
The 9th Cir opinion would stand.
tommyrot - Mar 26, 2013 6:17:46 am PDT #16066 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
the lower-court opinion (that strikes down Prop. 8) would stand?
I think. But just in California, right? Or a few other states?
Sparky1 - Mar 26, 2013 6:18:45 am PDT #16067 of 30001
Librarian Warlord
Another tweet:
SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog 5m There are not 5 votes to strike down #prop8 and recognize equal right to #ssm at this time