Now hold on, I'm gonna press the right pedal harder. I expect us to accelerate.

Anya ,'Showtime'


Natter 70: Hookers and Blow  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


billytea - Jun 11, 2012 8:42:10 am PDT #9205 of 30001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

Like, it could be the second coming of nutritional Jesus

"This is my body, take it and eat; for I am low GI and heart-friendly."


Consuela - Jun 11, 2012 8:45:48 am PDT #9206 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

No one's really arguing about meat, eggs, and vegetables (though some people eschew root vegetables), though, which makes Paleo essentially Atkins.

Yeah. There isn't a Paleo argument against root vegetables, because H&Gs would totally have eaten root vegetables, unless Paleos are claiming that domesticated vegetables are Right Out, in which case, good luck with your foraging in public parks, dude.

The Atkins argument against root vegetables is that they're usually full of carbs. Tasty, tasty carbohydrates. NOM.

I'm not really on board with Paleo being into eggs, though, since an easy supply of eggs is a result of domesticated fowl, and they wouldn't have been available year-round in quantity in the real Paleolithic.

If it was really paleo, wouldn't these people also be getting a lot of exercise trying to hunt and gather their food?

Well, yeah. And that too. Although some research has indicated that in the kind of environment real H&Gs lived in, one would only have had to spend a couple of hours/day looking for food, on average. Like a 20-hour work week, basically. I guess you spend the rest of the time tattooing your neighbor's back, and picking lice, and carving flutes out of antelope bones, and making Clovis points.


§ ita § - Jun 11, 2012 8:47:46 am PDT #9207 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

All the people I know who preach Paleo (there might be more following it, they're just not talky) teach Crossfit. So I was wondering if it was in the documentation or something.

Spock isn't green in The Cage. I know his blood is supposed to be green, but they never played that through, IIRC.


Zenkitty - Jun 11, 2012 8:49:30 am PDT #9208 of 30001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Why not root vegetables, though, Zen?

Two schools of thought, as I understand it. One says our primal ancestors would not have digging in the ground to find food and thus wouldn't have eaten roots. (Speaking as an anthropologist, I say bullshit.) The other says our primal ancestors might have eaten root vegetables, but the blood sugar/insulin hit is bad for us. (I disagree. The insulin hit isn't that bad because of the fiber in the vegetable. Most hunter-gatherer societies eat starchy root vegetables if they have access to them. And some of them get fat, too, especially the women. I think most of us have an idealized notion of how much exercise the average hunter-gatherer gets on a daily basis.)


tommyrot - Jun 11, 2012 8:52:44 am PDT #9209 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Google seems to agree with me.

eta: Link doesn't work. I googled "is spock's skin green".

Or maybe yellow?

'The Original Series' is famous for its garish costumes and sets. The purity and almost surreal vibrancy of colors in the new transfer far exceed that of earlier DVD releases. The yellowish tinge of Leonard Nimoy's makeup in the early episodes is much more obvious here than it's ever been before. (The thinking at the time was that Spock's green blood would leave his skin with a jaundiced look, an effect that was toned down as the series progressed).

[link]


le nubian - Jun 11, 2012 8:53:49 am PDT #9210 of 30001
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

For the people who know about Paleo:

from my understanding as human beings we are considerably different from humans who lived in 1900, much less those who lived literally hand to mouth thousands of years ago. Why should we advocate the same approximate diet if our bodies differ so much?


§ ita § - Jun 11, 2012 8:54:57 am PDT #9211 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Google seems to agree with me.

I don't understand.


Amy - Jun 11, 2012 8:55:10 am PDT #9212 of 30001
Because books.

the blood sugar/insulin hit is bad for us. (I disagree. The insulin hit isn't that bad because of the fiber in the vegetable.

But you don't get insulin from food -- your pancreas manufactures it to use glucose properly.

Root vegetables may be full of carbs, but they're still healthier than a donut, you know?

But that's me -- I can't imagine giving up anything I like, so.


Consuela - Jun 11, 2012 8:56:38 am PDT #9213 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

Speaking as an anthropologist, I say bullshit.

Indeed. It's a hell of a lot easier to dig up some purple potatoes than chase down an alpaca, you know?


tommyrot - Jun 11, 2012 8:58:18 am PDT #9214 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I don't understand.

Many of those links say he's green.