Not clicking on the link...
Willow: Yes. Hi. You must be Angel's handsome, yet androgynous, son. Connor: It's Connor. Willow: And the sneer's genetic. Who knew?
'A Hole in the World'
Natter 70: Hookers and Blow
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
quester - May 28, 2012 5:42:48 pm PDT #7320 of 30001
Danger is my middle name, only I spell it R. u. t. h. - Tina Belcher.
§ ita § - May 28, 2012 6:04:52 pm PDT #7321 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Did they follow birth orders with the lineup?
A common trope in the pairing I read is for both brothers to come out of the closet and date siblings. And I' just thinking "that's a lot of gay *and* a lot of family". The all gay thing, however, I grok. I'm related to that, pretty much. But marrying siblings? Lawdy!
Zenkitty - May 28, 2012 6:05:23 pm PDT #7322 of 30001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.
Did they follow birth orders with the lineup?
I believe they did!
§ ita § - May 28, 2012 6:06:15 pm PDT #7323 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Oh, hey, any artists here-given that I don't do hairspray, should I just wait until I get fixative before finishing the piece? Is here any other substitute to fixative I might have around the house?
§ ita § - May 28, 2012 6:07:17 pm PDT #7324 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I believe they did!
Okay, thats comforting too. In the rope I was complaining about it was older brother to younger brother, so when you do it so they've been hanging out a while it's often a creepy age gap and it smacks of grooming.
Dana - May 28, 2012 6:10:51 pm PDT #7325 of 30001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
Nothing quite like falling in the aisle of a plane when you're deplaning. Or deboarding. I know now, because I've done it!
No serious injury, fortunately, though I'll have a lovely bruise on my arm for several days.
§ ita § - May 28, 2012 6:15:48 pm PDT #7326 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Hey, it's a bit late, but -- don't break your hand,
Liese S. - May 28, 2012 6:20:52 pm PDT #7327 of 30001
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
Oh, no, Dana! I'm glad you're (mostly) all right!
My sister and I hung out a lot with a set of brothers. It was totally conceivable that we'd have dated siblings. She was engaged to the oldest brother. There were a total of four, and I was the same age as the second youngest, who was my best friend through childhood. Although, when they broke up, my mom took me aside and lectured me that I was not to then date my sister's ex-fiance. I was, maybe fifteen? I was all WTF...well, now that you mention it...
She believed that the oldest brother (who was a few years younger than older sis, but a few years older than me) would totally have been a better fit with me (he was a musician, much more easy-going than my sister, etc.) but that of course I shouldn't then date him. I had no intention of dating him, I was just super disappointed he wasn't going to be my brother-in-law.
Then I went on to date a guy that was even older than him, so I guess my mom was right to worry.
Also: Thanks, Liese!
Wait, for what? The giant goodstuff queue dump I did?
Zenkitty - May 28, 2012 6:21:17 pm PDT #7328 of 30001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.
I was slightly wrong. Polly Loving married Stephen Stone (my grandmother's grandfather, I think) in Dec 1803. Walter Loving married Dolly Stone in April 1806. Betsey Loving married Nicholas Stone in Feb 1808. So the Lovings were 2 girls and a boy and the Stones were 2 boys and a girl.
Dana - May 28, 2012 6:22:22 pm PDT #7329 of 30001
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
I had not even remembered Erin's fall until now, but I'm very glad I didn't break a hand (or an arm). Though I suppose since I fell on my suitcase, it broke my fall?