But you can't strike men in the groin. It's mean.
Also, didn't Kevin Smith do that already?
That's disturbing. You're emotionally scarred and will end up badly.
Anya ,'Bring On The Night'
Natter 70: Hookers and Blow
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
§ ita § - Jul 15, 2012 10:53:33 am PDT #14009 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Allyson - Jul 15, 2012 10:59:30 am PDT #14010 of 30001
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
What if it was just a kick in the ass? Everyone has an ass.
Atropa - Jul 15, 2012 11:03:35 am PDT #14011 of 30001
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.
Ima start a kickstarter for this project.
I'm in. I would love to do this.
§ ita § - Jul 15, 2012 11:04:15 am PDT #14012 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Well, as long as you worked out rights issues with Jay and Silent Bob, you should be okay.
I love this video of Zachary Levi selling himself for charity, and then getting bought: [link]
Jessica - Jul 15, 2012 11:06:08 am PDT #14013 of 30001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
Also, didn't Kevin Smith do that already?
Yeah, in a movie. No actual crotches were kicked, so I think Allyson's on solid ground.
Allyson - Jul 15, 2012 11:06:34 am PDT #14014 of 30001
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
I think I'm funnier than Jay and Silent Bob, though. They don't own the concept of kicking trolls in the pants.
One of those two sentences may be too bold.
Allyson - Jul 15, 2012 11:11:09 am PDT #14015 of 30001
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
Atropa - Jul 15, 2012 11:15:29 am PDT #14016 of 30001
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.
I think I'm funnier than Jay and Silent Bob, though. They don't own the concept of kicking trolls in the pants.
Both of those sentences are true.
msbelle - Jul 15, 2012 11:16:29 am PDT #14017 of 30001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
More NF love. Zachary Levi is just cute as a button.
I got my haircut, meds picked up and a few groceries bought. Now mac has a playmate over and I am free (within the house free) for 3-4 hours - not sure I have motivation for much.
§ ita § - Jul 15, 2012 11:17:27 am PDT #14018 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
But if you're going to do something similar to assholes on the internet that's been seen by assholes on the internet, you're going to have assholes on the internet on the extra defensive. It's kind of recursively tautologically self-powering, you see.
And, good lord, I described Limahl as super saiyan, which makes me feel very conflicted. I'm halfway convinced that sentence cannot exist. The concept destroys itself.
What is the upper boundary of "good touch" at the office? I'm assuming that shaking hands is normally acceptable professional contact--I had a first-time meeting with a vendor's VP on Friday (which was a big oops), and he tapped me gently on both the forearm and the thigh to emphasise points he was making. I don't personally have a visceral aversion to either contact, but technically I feel that they're both inappropriate with someone you've just met, the latter more so than the former, by a fair bit.
I asked my sister what she thought was okay touching--a hug, or a hand at the small of your back, and she rejected both--the hug is okay if you've established a relationship, and the small of the back thing especially from a man to a woman she thought was weird.
What do you think HR thinks?