Watching this unfold in real time is reporting hilarity.
'Objects In Space'
Natter 70: Hookers and Blow
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Matilda rocks.
Happy Birthday, Hec.
I heard that the mandate was upheld.
But I'm sure that more indepth reports will be coming out throughout the day.
The Supreme Court has struck down the individual mandate for health care - the legislation that requires all to have health insurance.
That's no birthday present! Try again SCOTUS dogs.
"I was thinking. If I made a little birdhouse in my soul, I would probably get a splinter."
Tiny philosopher!
The Cindy quote I repeat most often is, "These cats aren't going to stack themselves."
SCOUTS summarizes bottom line as entire ACA upheld, only the Medicaid bit being torn up a little.
I do miss work chat too. Although it was being monitored (everything was saved, and the CIO would read random chats every week) and we had strict rules about what we could and could not do (no foreign language, even if it's "obvious"), it made for some quick and relaxed communication. It didn't have to be as "for posterity" as an email, but served as a good "we don't have to call to talk about this, do we?" means of communication.
I want it back.
Though I was surprised at how many people my age and/or higher than me in the food chain bust out the emoticons and ROFLOLed all over the place.
Still not cute, guys.
The Cindy quote I repeat most often is, "These cats aren't going to stack themselves."
I still like, "Xander. In a Speedo. Wet."
Yay. And interesting about Roberts.
In your face, CNN!
ETA: they're walking it back:
Correction: The Supreme Court backs all parts of President Obama’s signature health care law, including the individual mandate that requires all to have health insurance.
They say Roberts' vote saved it - so it might be Kennedy was on the other side?
Quoting from SCOTUSblog: The money quote from the section on the mandate: Our precedent demonstrates that Congress had the power to impose the exaction in Section 5000A under the taxing power, and that Section 5000A need not be read to do more than impose a tax. This is sufficient to sustain it.