She didn't even touch her pumpkin. It's a freak with no face.

Willow ,'Help'


Natter 69: Practically names itself.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Beverly - Oct 15, 2011 8:31:09 pm PDT #1803 of 30001
Days shrink and grow cold, sunlight through leaves is my song. Winter is long.

I wish you could stay longer, too ita. You sound much...calmer. Alarms have been allayed, somewhat, and that's good.

We get the "are you in the medical field?" question too. All I said was, "it's palmer-planter, confined to the print part of the hand and foot. And it usually presents bi-laterally. I'd prefer a topical to a systemic, but I avoid both if possible."

The sexuality discussions have provided some clues and resolution to lifelong issues for me, and a starting point for more research, and understanding. I've always accepted the assignment of woman, though I've resented more than rejoiced in it. I have a lot of traditionally male opinions and points of view, though I come from a female place. So I have, and continue to be, intrigued and informed by these discussions--with an occasional bright illumination.


sarameg - Oct 16, 2011 2:21:20 am PDT #1804 of 30001

My computer seems to have died overnight. Not pleased.


sarameg - Oct 16, 2011 2:28:08 am PDT #1805 of 30001

Hoping it just got unplugged and a little time in sleep mode will bring it back, but it won't wake up or reboot. Feh.


§ ita § - Oct 16, 2011 3:04:01 am PDT #1806 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I hate that panicky feeling of hardware failure.

I have given substantive comments on three of the five sexual identity papers. But no scores. I'm scared of scores, even if they are in pencil for her review. The two I've left for last taunt me. One is written by a woman I'm pretty sure is homophobic. Her tone is very smug and distant. But I can't mark her down for her beliefs. I'm just trying to work out where the lines are. And the other one is nigh incomprehensible. My sister gives really detailed line edits. She's hardcore. This paper can't be edited like that. It needs deep tissue rewriting. And I can't make head nor tail of her point. She keeps going off the rail two thirds of the way through the sentence.

I don't know how y'all do this for a living. Correcting business documents on the down low is stressful enough.


sarameg - Oct 16, 2011 3:12:14 am PDT #1807 of 30001

At least I backed up 2 days ago? I'll use my work laptop while I explore my options. Now to keep the genius bar appt or not. I think I know what they'll tellme , alas.


§ ita § - Oct 16, 2011 4:13:56 am PDT #1808 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Gah. She says to start off every evaluation with a positive. What if I can't find one? How do you guys survive?


Cashmere - Oct 16, 2011 4:24:40 am PDT #1809 of 30001
Now tagless for your comfort.

But I can't mark her down for her beliefs.

That's a pity.


§ ita § - Oct 16, 2011 4:30:20 am PDT #1810 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Theoretically, I don't think homosexuality not being a choice is a *belief*, but that's the smugness of my position.

She just so proudly presents the fact she's never met a gay or trans* person. It's icky.


smonster - Oct 16, 2011 5:45:14 am PDT #1811 of 30001
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

She just so proudly presents the fact she's never met a gay or trans* person. It's icky.

That she knows of!

Hardware~ma, sarameg.


Jesse - Oct 16, 2011 5:51:21 am PDT #1812 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Ugh, sara. Genius bar seems worth a shot at least?