Incidentally, bad as "stand your ground" statues are, they still are not on z's side. He was told not to confront and did so. "Not retreating" is one thing. Agressively seeking out confrontation is another, even under that law. Ta-Nehsi Coats has been all over this story (as an aggregator, not adding original reporting). This story includes some stuff dealing with the law. [link]
Spike's Bitches 47: Someone Dangerous Could Get In
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Why hasn't he been arrested?
Because based on current law, it's not at all clear he committed any crime. Which just shows the sickening direction we've allowed the state of law to take.
(Which is not at all to say that, were the complexions reversed, the i interpretation of whether or not a crime had been committed would not be different. We all know it would be.)
He was told not to confront and did so. "Not retreating" is one thing. Agressively seeking out confrontation is another, even under that law.
I'm not at all sure it will play out that way. But this is exactly where public pressure could in fact have some impact.
Not a lwayer, but the link above suggests that if it does not play out that way, it is abuse of police and prosecutorial discretin, and not valid law. Of course if the prosecutor is pressured into bringing a case they don't want there are all sorts of ways they can throw the case. So public pressure not only to bring the case, but to pursue it vigorously.
I just can't get over he wasn't even brought in for questioning after the killing. It boggles my mind. I just read an article in which the killer's family is claiming that he can't be a racist because he's Hispanic. Sorry, being from one ethnic group does not exempt you from being a racist against another.
not to mention that he has called 911 several times complaining about Black people.
not to mention that he has called 911 several times complaining about Black people.
The 911 call I saw the transcript of was infuriating.
T-N C specifically pointed out that it is less important what was in his heart than what he did. In my less polite way,I'd say it is less important that he is a racist than that he is a murderer. Not that there is not overwhelming evidence that he is a racist, but "I am not a racist" is not actually a defense against an accusation of murder.
T-N C specifically pointed out that it is less important what was in his heart than what he did. In my less polite way,I'd say it is less important that he is a racist than that he is a murderer. Not that there is not overwhelming evidence that he is a racist, but "I am not a racist" is not actually a defense against an accusation of murder.
Except when it comes to hate crime laws, right? I don't know if FL has those.
he did murder someone. that is a fact. the issue is whether he felt threatened at the time - from a legal perspective.
Morally, he is done. Nothing he can say at this point will suffice. The issue now is whether he will lose his freedom, and a more minor concern, if he will be giving the deed to his house to the victim's family.
Even if it wasn't a hate crime (which it was), it was still murder. The man should be arrested and tried for first-degree murder, regardless of his ethnicity, or his racism or lack thereof.
How could Z. have been threatened? He was in an SUV with a gun, on the phone with 911 telling him not to engage. The boy was on foot and unarmed. This is premeditated murder.