Could just be a hoax, though. I fake some headaches, everyone gets used to poor helpless Spike. Then one day, no warning, I snap a spine, bend a head back, drain 'em dry. Brilliant.

Spike ,'Potential'


Spike's Bitches 47: Someone Dangerous Could Get In  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


JenP - Nov 16, 2011 6:39:41 am PST #2884 of 30001

I would make an exception and happily drink wine with you at any hour, Jen!

Woo-hoo!

(obviously, chopped liver ... with no wine)

Wine and pate all around!!! (I can't make the accent mark)

Dammit, I just lost a page of writing. Stream of consciousness flotsam, but words nonetheless. My bar is set low in that area right now.

Bending to accommodate others, yeah it's hard to see from the inside where slightly bendy turns into carnival contortionist, which hurts to do.


DavidS - Nov 16, 2011 6:53:00 am PST #2885 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

(obviously, chopped liver ... with no wine)

You come over and drink with me, Todd. We'll slip some brandy into our coffee to start.


DavidS - Nov 16, 2011 6:55:05 am PST #2886 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Every relationship requires some compromise, so I don't think it's intrinsically wrong to accommodate your partner.

You just have to know the difference between compromising on what you want or how you do things and compromising yourself to the point where you are ill at ease in your own skin.


smonster - Nov 16, 2011 7:11:17 am PST #2887 of 30001
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

You just have to know the difference between compromising on what you want or how you do things and compromising yourself to the point where you are ill at ease in your own skin.

Right. Most recently with StW and with B, I did some of the latter by twisting myself into an emotional pretzel around what they wanted in terms of a relationship. In both cases, that was "not a relationship".


Ginger - Nov 16, 2011 7:41:41 am PST #2888 of 30001
"It didn't taste good. It tasted soooo horrible. It tasted like....a vodka martini." - Matilda

In retrospect, I don't like the person I became when I was married, because I spent too much of my time and myself trying to keep him happy. I am a classic Hero Child, the child of an alcoholic who tried to keep everything together. That impulse has reared its ugly head in every relationship I've had, and I don't want to go there again.


Steph L. - Nov 16, 2011 7:46:17 am PST #2889 of 30001
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Every relationship requires some compromise, so I don't think it's intrinsically wrong to accommodate your partner.

See, I think there's a big difference between compromise and changing oneself for a partner. To be asked (outright OR tacitly) to change oneself isn't "compromise." Compromise is mutually arrived at.


Amy - Nov 16, 2011 7:47:51 am PST #2890 of 30001
Because books.

I think the key difference is that you may compromise what or how you do things (he'll cook, so you'll clean, etc.), but you shouldn't compromise or change *who* you are.


DavidS - Nov 16, 2011 7:52:46 am PST #2891 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

but you shouldn't compromise or change *who* you are.

I really don't think that's the principle. Being in a relationship should change you. Ideally for the better. But you shouldn't feel the need to squelch yourself.

My rule of thumb when assessing a relationship was more like: Does being with this person bring out the best in me? Am I my best self in this relationship?


javachik - Nov 16, 2011 7:53:11 am PST #2892 of 30001
Our wings are not tired.

In my last relationship it was kind of funny because my personality never changed and one of the things said to me (at the end) was that I could be too argumentative and bossy. And I said back "I was that way when you fell in love with me! Why was it attractive then and not now?" I am proud of myself for staying the way I am, because I was truly an awesome girlfriend. The "argumentative" label came from me listening to what he was saying, and when I disagreed, actually saying so. The majority of the time, I did agree with him, but it was the minority that stuck in his craw. And the "bossy" thing? That would be because after years of dating a man who was perpetually horribly lost (he is the first to tell you he has no internal compass), instead of walking around in circles endlessly trying to find something with him leading, I'd just say "I'm stopping and looking at a map" and correct our route.

The only difference was that when we first started dating, meandering endlessly around Paris or Boston or whatever with him hopelessly lost didn't matter as much to me because I was in love and holding hands and he'd kiss me at every corner. Four years later I just wanted to get to the fucking restaurant.

I have no regrets. My personality is forceful and I get shit done. If you are ill-prepared to deal with that, you're not the man for me. So there! :)


smonster - Nov 16, 2011 7:58:19 am PST #2893 of 30001
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

"I was that way when you fell in love with me! Why was it attractive then and not now?"

Yeah, StW told me early on that he liked that I was impatient to see him again.

Four years later I just wanted to get to the fucking restaurant.

Ahahaha. Also, I think you may have just answered your own question.

I have no regrets. My personality is forceful and I get shit done. If you are ill-prepared to deal with that, you're not the man for me. So there! :)

I love you, javachik.