Mal: Ready? Zoe: Always.

'Serenity'


Spike's Bitches 47: Someone Dangerous Could Get In  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


beekaytee - Jan 31, 2013 9:20:09 am PST #25729 of 30001
Compassionately intolerant

Seriously, Steph. No hurry at all, if at all. I've decide not to be freaked out, you know?


le nubian - Jan 31, 2013 9:21:49 am PST #25730 of 30001
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

I happen to love Target pharmacy because of the pill bottles. I know that is frivolous.


meara - Jan 31, 2013 9:22:08 am PST #25731 of 30001

I should note that I think some drugs are overpriced, but it's just plain ignorant to pretend that Pfizer should be charging the customer literally ONLY what the cost of the active drug ingredient is.)

Hahahah! Yes. I mean, I totally agree that drug companies often overprice their drugs and do shady things to keep patents going, etc etc. But since my salary comes from R&D money to make those drugs get to the market in the first place...Does she also think eBooks and music should be free, since there's no book or CD involved? (I support them being CHEAPER due to those things, but surely not free)


erikaj - Jan 31, 2013 9:22:33 am PST #25732 of 30001
Always Anti-fascist!

Advertising drugs, from what I understand, is bad for their costs. But the active ingredient has probably not even been shaped into pills/gelcaps...whatever, at that stage. I'm not that interested in filling my shower with antacid.


Steph L. - Jan 31, 2013 9:25:11 am PST #25733 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

Does she also think eBooks and music should be free, since there's no book or CD involved? (I support them being CHEAPER due to those things, but surely not free)

Probably, but I'm glad I don't actually know.


meara - Jan 31, 2013 9:28:40 am PST #25734 of 30001

Advertising drugs, from what I understand, is bad for their costs.

Ooh, yes, this very much. Especially ads to consumers. Ads to doctors are iffy (and apparently have more influence on them than I'd like), but I understand wanting to get your product and any benefits it may have over other products out there...but really it should be done in the more traditional (and still happens!) way of "Here! I am at your doctor conference for oncology with my poster about how we did a study showing our drug is better than the other drug! Stop by and read my scientific paper, if you'd like!"


Steph L. - Jan 31, 2013 9:32:47 am PST #25735 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

"Here! I am at your doctor conference for oncology with my poster about how we did a study showing our drug is better than the other drug! Stop by and read my scientific paper, if you'd like!"

Drug companies buy very large quantities of article reprints from us for this very reason (that, and sales visits to physicians' offices). "Look! Our drug was shown in this paper to be statistically superior to placebo! You should start prescribing it!"


erikaj - Jan 31, 2013 9:39:36 am PST #25736 of 30001
Always Anti-fascist!

Well, that sounds better to me than ads. And then, ads for lawyers' settlements for the same crap that was in all the ads last year.


Connie Neil - Jan 31, 2013 9:40:40 am PST #25737 of 30001
brillig

ads for lawyers' settlements for the same crap that was in all the ads last year.

yes, I love seeing those ads for drugs I was on a few years ago. I always think "Huh, I wonder if that's why I was taken off of it."


beekaytee - Jan 31, 2013 9:55:09 am PST #25738 of 30001
Compassionately intolerant

I happen to love Target pharmacy because of the pill bottles. I know that is frivolous.

The bottles are cool.

I was kind of shocked, really.