Kaylee: H-how did you... g-get on...? Early: Strains the mind a bit, don't it? You think you're all alone. Maybe I come down the chimney, Kaylee. Bring presents to the good girls and boys.

'Objects In Space'


Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


quester - May 21, 2011 11:27:22 am PDT #9127 of 30001
Danger is my middle name, only I spell it R. u. t. h. - Tina Belcher.

billytea: Hi everyone. Um... No earthquakes here. (Is that a spoiler? Should I be whitefonting?)

Erin: Worrying about the Rapture is on my list of shit to be concerned about. It's right under item 20,306: Worrying about corkboards becoming animate and eating me.

You guys make the Apocalypse fun!


Amy - May 21, 2011 11:27:30 am PDT #9128 of 30001
Because books.

Wow. Speaking of perception, Ben has a friend over. Apparently he's also in eighth grade, but this kid has to be six feet tall, and could probably throw me across the room. No way I'd think *middle-schooler* if I saw him on the street.


Hil R. - May 21, 2011 11:28:57 am PDT #9129 of 30001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

It would all be easier if English has a gender-neutral pronoun that wasn't plural. I don't mind saying "they" when I'm talking about unspecified persons, but when talking about someone - a baby - right in front of me, it doesn't sound right. If we could look at a baby and coo, "oh, isn't ** cute!" without having to say he or she or IT, knowing the baby's gender might not seem quite so important.

In older books (I noticed this most recently in Wuthering Heights, but I've seen it in other stuff from that era), it seems like people refer to children as "it" all the time, even when the gender is known.


Zenkitty - May 21, 2011 11:34:18 am PDT #9130 of 30001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

My grandmother persisted in referring to me as "it" even when I was right there, until I was about ten years old. This may be why I dislike referring to children as "it".


sumi - May 21, 2011 11:34:25 am PDT #9131 of 30001
Art Crawl!!!

Didn't people (at some point in the past) dress small children v. similarly up until an ages (not sure what age it would be) - i.e., long hair, clothing more like gowns?


brenda m - May 21, 2011 11:37:18 am PDT #9132 of 30001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Apparently he's also in eighth grade, but this kid has to be six feet tall, and could probably throw me across the room. No way I'd think *middle-schooler* if I saw him on the street.

Is he related to Laura's Brendon?


tommyrot - May 21, 2011 11:38:35 am PDT #9133 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Because of the suposed Rapture, a woman tried to kill her two daughters and herself. And a man in Nairobi killed himself.

[link]


Amy - May 21, 2011 11:39:20 am PDT #9134 of 30001
Because books.

sumi, I think the Victorians and maybe earlier had kids of both sexes in long white dresses until toddlerhood.

Is he related to Laura's Brendon?

You'd think. Enormous sweet puppydog, too.


§ ita § - May 21, 2011 11:40:30 am PDT #9135 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I was referred to as it for a while. And then mistaken for a boy into my 30s. So, cautionary tale.

I have (more) porn questions. Straight porn for gay guys--what about it makes it not porn for straight guys, or even more likely, straight women? I get that straight men might not want to watch solo jerkoff acts much, but when it's a het pair, what do you emphasise that makes it more about a gay viewer than a straight woman?


Hil R. - May 21, 2011 11:41:14 am PDT #9136 of 30001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

Didn't people (at some point in the past) dress small children v. similarly up until an ages (not sure what age it would be) - i.e., long hair, clothing more like gowns?

[link] The photo gallery there includes Franklin Roosevelt as a child with long hair and a frilly dress.