Also, you can tell it's not gonna have a happy ending when the main guy's all bumpy.

Tara ,'First Date'


Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


bon bon - Apr 28, 2011 7:09:02 am PDT #5714 of 30001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

flea says what I was thinking. It's hard for someone inclined to use the word "slut" to really consider whether those numbers consist of guys that were well-chosen. The denotation is lots of guys. The connotation is indiscriminate.


SuziQ - Apr 28, 2011 7:09:10 am PDT #5715 of 30001
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame

"He's a slut for new technology,"

I would take it as "he would do anything for new technology, even sleep with the whole department if necessary".


smonster - Apr 28, 2011 7:10:40 am PDT #5716 of 30001
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

I agree that it's primarily used to describe women - otherwise "male" is appended. I've neve heard he term "female slut," and it feels redundant. Also, the woman in question may not have even had sex a all; her peers may just not like who she flirts with and want to ruin her reputation. I do not use the word.

eta uggh, iPhone typing.


meara - Apr 28, 2011 7:12:11 am PDT #5717 of 30001

What everyone else said on the slut thing. Some of it also not about the persons they sleep with but the circumstances? Like, it's not that she sleeps with skanky losers or jerks or whatever, but Luke, has one night stands or sleeps with someone after not knowing them long? For ita's "indiscriminate" category.


Fred Pete - Apr 28, 2011 7:12:48 am PDT #5718 of 30001
Ann, that's a ferret.

And in this scenario, does it mean he uses a lot of new technology, or that he'll use any old new technology, and not apply much discretion to it?

Not as familiar with this use, but I'd interpret as "buying any and every new gadget that comes on the market, regardless of whether he needs it or even has a use for it."

In the sexual sense, I usually interpret as "has had more partners or is less discriminating in choice of partners than the speaker approves." So I see use of the word in that sense as a commentary on the speaker at least as much as on the person spoken about. But that's just me, and I suspect a minority view.


Jessica - Apr 28, 2011 7:12:53 am PDT #5719 of 30001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

I do think indiscriminate and "a lot" in general run together - presumably it's pretty hard to have sex with 100 people and be discriminating?

Yeah, this. I actually think "slut" implies a lack of choosiness more than a lot of sex partners.


Tom Scola - Apr 28, 2011 7:14:33 am PDT #5720 of 30001
hwæt

A bookstore that sells one book.


§ ita § - Apr 28, 2011 7:16:28 am PDT #5721 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Although I have usually seen slut applied to women, I don't think I've encountered (or not notably) "male slut" or similar modifiers. It's just not used to refer to men as much in my experience.

I actually think "slut" implies a lack of choosiness more than a lot of sex partners.

That's pretty much where I am with it, but having read a recent article, some people were just referring to quantity.

And, yeah, I might be a slut for sleeping with the right guy if I sleep with him after only knowing him for ten minutes, and perfectly cromulent if I wait until the third date or whatever.


Jesse - Apr 28, 2011 7:26:42 am PDT #5722 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

When I think about reclaiming, I prefer the adjective, not the noun -- sleeping with a guy after knowing him for ten minutes might be slutty, but it doesn't make you A Slut. I guess. Especially if it's a numbers game -- maybe you only have sex every five years, but each time it's with someone you just met.


§ ita § - Apr 28, 2011 7:28:39 am PDT #5723 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Oh, for the love of god, no.

maybe you only have sex every five years, but each time it's with someone you just met.

No, I think I'm still a slut.

Oh, god, my head hurts and I just want to expire.