Oh and w/r/t your father-in-law's offer to help, he is probably feeling scared and useless in the face of this too and wants to do something concrete. Bob's mom and sister offered to come out when he had his first surgery and Bob was pretty hesitant at first (not wanting having them here to be a burden on me and knowing there was not much they could actually do to help). I didn't mind them coming and knew it would probably be a huge thing for them to just be able to see him so I encouraged him to tell them to come.
Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
It was Pat Robertson, Jesse. Falwell's dead.
Thanks for the advice, folks. (Calli, it's not weather-related, thank goodness - people on East Coast are in a different hell altogether!)
It was Pat Robertson, Jesse. Falwell's dead.
Oh yeah. Oops. Anyway, I think it's bananas.
Well, see, because abandoning your spouse in need is better than adultery. Which the guy was committing by dating women while his wife was zonked.
I think so many things about this. First that getting divorced doesn't necessarily mean abandoning, actually. Also that some people get legally divorced for financial reasons in these circumstances. Also that dating isn't necessarily adultery. Also that adultery might not be the worst thing in the world, anyway. Also that shouldn't someone who's so up in arms about the bible and morality and marriage be against divorce?
Anyway.
Oh yeah. Oops. Anyway, I think it's bananas.
I think Sullivan posted something to the affect that if his reasoning is that marriage is just a contract (and that seems to be his reasoning) and not a holy union, that his issue with gay marriage is moot.
It's just one more thing that makes me wish a cartoon anvil would fall on Pat Robertson's head.
This is what I'm saying. If HE's saying that you can get divorced when your marriage is inconvenient and difficult, then WTF.
I thought his reasoning was that the afflicted spouse was "gone" from the marriage, making it not wrongful.
I don't view it as abandonment either, since the person might already be in a care situation. They might find someone else, too -- Sandra Day O'Conner's husband did.
I thought his reasoning was that the afflicted spouse was "gone" from the marriage, making it not wrongful.
I misunderstood, then. Or got shitty data.
He said Alzheimer's was like being dead, so, "til death do us part."