Oh yeah. Oops. Anyway, I think it's bananas.
I think Sullivan posted something to the affect that if his reasoning is that marriage is just a contract (and that seems to be his reasoning) and not a holy union, that his issue with gay marriage is moot.
It's just one more thing that makes me wish a cartoon anvil would fall on Pat Robertson's head.
This is what I'm saying. If HE's saying that you can get divorced when your marriage is inconvenient and difficult, then WTF.
I thought his reasoning was that the afflicted spouse was "gone" from the marriage, making it not wrongful.
I don't view it as abandonment either, since the person might already be in a care situation. They might find someone else, too -- Sandra Day O'Conner's husband did.
I thought his reasoning was that the afflicted spouse was "gone" from the marriage, making it not wrongful.
I misunderstood, then. Or got shitty data.
He said Alzheimer's was like being dead, so, "til death do us part."
I saw a clip of it and he seemed to be saying that the person you'd married was essentially gone, yeah.
Still. It certainly surprised me to hear it from him.
Still. It certainly surprised me to hear it from him.
Yeah. That's definitely seems off, considering the source.
That's all I'm saying. Not that as a concept it's horrible, but I don't get it from him.
I'm just not sure how primer is supposed to look and feel
I don't know how it's supposed to interact with foundation, which is what it's primarily intended to support, but the Smashbox stuff makes my skin look smooth and fine grain velvety.