Oh, I read about that. I don't hold SRB responsible personally, but that's why I'd like a start over, even at her expense. Even IF she didn't know about it personally, it is endemic to the current political sphere. I'd like to clean house, even if it means a steep learning curve. There's a lot of incestuous shit in city business. And a lot of broken going unchallenged.
Excuse me? Who gave you permission to exist?
Cordelia ,'Beneath You'
Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
sarameg - Sep 13, 2011 6:15:29 pm PDT #26016 of 30001
lisah - Sep 13, 2011 6:18:18 pm PDT #26017 of 30001
Punishingly Intricate
Even IF she didn't know about it personally, it is endemic to the current political sphere. I'd like to clean house, even if it means a steep learning curve. There's a lot of incestuous shit in city business. And a lot of broken going unchallenged.
Yeah, exactly.
§ ita § - Sep 13, 2011 6:18:50 pm PDT #26018 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Does heteromantic require asexuality? I thought there was an axis of romance, and one of sexuality, so most people==heteromantic heterosexual, but you could also be heteromantic homo/pan/demi/asexual. That the two aren't related.
DebetEsse - Sep 13, 2011 6:21:40 pm PDT #26019 of 30001
Woe to the fucking wicked.
I'd bet that they would correlate, though I don't know how strongly. Most people would, I think, assume that heterosexual implies heteroromantic, but that's certainly a privileged assumption.
Connie Neil - Sep 13, 2011 6:23:51 pm PDT #26020 of 30001
brillig
When it comes to sexuality, my brain tries to keep up, then just flops and goes "I like guys. I like guys who like guys. May you like who you like in peace, and please don't startle the cat."
§ ita § - Sep 13, 2011 6:24:10 pm PDT #26021 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The person I saw outraged was a heteromantic asexual, but I was thinking she was or wasn't queer on the strength of the aceness.
Also, she defined straight as requiring being cisgender. Oh. But I think of my FTM cousin as straight, because he married a woman. It just seemed respectful. He's just not cis. Does that mean he's queer? QUILTBAG, maybe, but not queer.
§ ita § - Sep 13, 2011 6:24:44 pm PDT #26022 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I like guys who like guys
You don't like guys who like girls?
Cass - Sep 13, 2011 6:26:21 pm PDT #26023 of 30001
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.
I thought there was an axis of romance, and one of sexuality, so most people==heteromantic heterosexual, but you could also be heteromantic homo/pan/demi/asexual. That the two aren't related.
That's how I understood it.
JenP - Sep 13, 2011 6:35:10 pm PDT #26024 of 30001
I think I need a chart of some sort here. I thought I had it, and then ita ! confused me again.
§ ita § - Sep 13, 2011 6:42:54 pm PDT #26025 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The problem with the sexual axis is that it isn't a line. Other than that, it's a perfect model.
Nice addition of Matt Cohen to 90210. Discombobulating.