5 ml is pretty close to a teaspoon. And half-centiliter is unwieldy.
Cordelia ,'The Cautionary Tale of Numero Cinco'
Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
But I thought it was three! Why does Oz measure differently?
Worst plane ride ever--guy took offense at me telling his gf her cell was supposed to be off and threatened me for the next 20 minutes. Kinda scary really, especially since I was in te window seat. Way to end the vacation.
I agree with meara, it's three teaspoons to a tablespoon.
It's always been three teaspoons to a tablespoon here too!
American measurement systems are really, really wacky.
Yikes, meara, that's awful! I hope you are off the plane and far away from that guy now.
WTF, meara?
I think I would have been tempted to alert a stewttendant. Threatening you? Um, no. Air marshall!
But I thought it was three! Why does Oz measure differently?
It's three most places aside from Oz. The reason is because you define it on an imperial measure, fluid ounces, and when we went decimal, we went hard-core. Or something like that.
I thought about it, but didn't want to, from the window seat, call one over and get Into it. Nor did I want to ask him and his girlfriend to move so I could get to the lav and attendants.
The latest Oatmeal is relevant to this conversation.
I would argue that the imperial system is more practical for some applications. Say, for example, you have a recipe that calls for a cup of water and makes 6 servings of whatever, and you want to cut it down to 1 serving. So you need 1/6 of a cup, or 8 teaspoons. But if a similar recipe calls for 250 ml of water, you'd cut it down to 41.67 ml. Sure, you could round down to what is apparently 2 metric tablespoons and it would probably be fine, but that's not more precise and logical, is it?