I hope you don't think that I just come over for the spells and everything. I mean, I really like just talking and hanging out with you and stuff.

Willow ,'First Date'


Natter 67: Overriding Vetoes  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, nail polish, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Burrell - Mar 17, 2011 7:15:12 am PDT #28819 of 30001
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!

I'm glad to hear you have a diagnosis ita, but I dislike the "nothing to be done about it" part. Take care of yourself.

Love the coelacanth pics. They are such neat creatures.

Well, there's a transforming plush coelacanth, but I don't like it.

My son has one of those. He likes it. I'm not sure how well it teaches the concept of evolution, however.


javachik - Mar 17, 2011 7:16:37 am PDT #28820 of 30001
Our wings are not tired.

Too expensive, flea.


tommyrot - Mar 17, 2011 7:20:22 am PDT #28821 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

What Is It? game 169

Can anyone figure out what this is? I immediately knew.

If you can't figure it out, consider how I grew up....

eta: Too late to win the t-shirt, though.


DavidS - Mar 17, 2011 7:26:47 am PDT #28822 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Ginger, put on your reassuring hat and tell me how unlikely this scenario is:

*****

More remarkably, Tepco warned on Wednesday: "The possibility of re-criticality is not zero".

This meant that in the company's view, it was possible that enough fissile uranium was present in the cooling pond in enough density to form a critical mass.

In other words, a nuclear fission chain reaction could start in a pond that lies outside parts of the building designed to contain radioactive materials.


hippocampus - Mar 17, 2011 7:59:01 am PDT #28823 of 30001
not your mom's socks.

BoingBoing folks are saying the NYT paywall can be referrer-spoofed. I'm sure that's short-lived, but wow.


javachik - Mar 17, 2011 8:01:29 am PDT #28824 of 30001
Our wings are not tired.

I believe in paying something for good, disinterested, investigative journalism; I just think $15 is too much. I did get an email with the pricing structure and with the free 20, etc, it's not so bad.


Jessica - Mar 17, 2011 8:07:09 am PDT #28825 of 30001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

Would $15/month be too much for the print edition? Just curious.


Jesse - Mar 17, 2011 8:08:49 am PDT #28826 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Yeah, $15/month isn't really very much, BUT it's hard to get away from the internet=free mentality.


Jessica - Mar 17, 2011 8:09:44 am PDT #28827 of 30001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

BUT it's hard to get away from the internet=free mentality.

This is the thing. The writers do the same amount of work to put a story online as they do on paper.


-t - Mar 17, 2011 8:11:50 am PDT #28828 of 30001
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

I get over 3 months of my local paper for $15, so that does seem like a lot.