Too expensive, flea.
'Lessons'
Natter 67: Overriding Vetoes
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, nail polish, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Can anyone figure out what this is? I immediately knew.
If you can't figure it out, consider how I grew up....
eta: Too late to win the t-shirt, though.
Ginger, put on your reassuring hat and tell me how unlikely this scenario is:
*****
More remarkably, Tepco warned on Wednesday: "The possibility of re-criticality is not zero".
This meant that in the company's view, it was possible that enough fissile uranium was present in the cooling pond in enough density to form a critical mass.
In other words, a nuclear fission chain reaction could start in a pond that lies outside parts of the building designed to contain radioactive materials.
BoingBoing folks are saying the NYT paywall can be referrer-spoofed. I'm sure that's short-lived, but wow.
I believe in paying something for good, disinterested, investigative journalism; I just think $15 is too much. I did get an email with the pricing structure and with the free 20, etc, it's not so bad.
Would $15/month be too much for the print edition? Just curious.
Yeah, $15/month isn't really very much, BUT it's hard to get away from the internet=free mentality.
BUT it's hard to get away from the internet=free mentality.
This is the thing. The writers do the same amount of work to put a story online as they do on paper.
I get over 3 months of my local paper for $15, so that does seem like a lot.
Can we buy one subscription as Buffistas and everybody logs in? Probably not, huh?