There needs to be a word that means, "A priest and a rabbi walk into a bar." Then a lot of jokes would take less time to tell.
Natter 67: Overriding Vetoes
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, nail polish, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
It doesn't have to be sexual!
HALLOO, innocent. It covers 75% of Dean/Castiel right there. Parker and Hardison do it all the time. Of course that's what it's for.
hair down+tiara.
my vote
Yeah, that would make it more obvious. And fun!
I love Parker/Hardison.
God, I can talk some bullshit sometimes. I like to think it greases the business wheels, but who knows? I may just look like a raging idiot.
Once when I was a kid Mom bought me some of those Breakfast Squares that were well over a year past their sell-by date. The cinnamon ones were my favorites, so we didn't find out about it until I got to the concrete-like chocolate squares. (Thinking about life before refrigerators and vacuum packing, that does make the extreme efforts taken to traverse spice-trading routes make a lot of sense.)
You know what's really simple? Write down your alternate outgoing message and read it instead of trying three times in a row to wing it, especially if you don't remember what day you come back in, and it contains two extensions.
FYI.
So I went to check 538 and they're saying: Dems will lose the House (expected in a mid-term, in down times); Dems will retain the Senate; Brown will beat Whitman for Gov of Cali; Boxer beats Fiorina for Senate.
I can live with that.
So if Republicans take the House but not the Senate,will they still need to rely on "2nd Amendment remedies"?