The Rise of "Logical Punctuation."
(they say Logical Punctuation, I say TRAVESTY.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
The Brits had it right this time.
ITA with ita. Non-quoted punctuation belongs outside the quotes.
What the Brits said.
In good news: seems like a quieter day. Also? Fucked up situation at work might not be as fucked as I thought it'll be.
ION: I'll graduate soon (3 papers and one test to go; I can finish it by August). WTF do I do next?
...
OK, I know what I'll do next. I just don't the specifics yet. Which is confusing.
It's the time for crazy offers, folks. I wasn't ready for the year and this degree to end so soon!
(they say Logical Punctuation, I say TRAVESTY.
Truer words have never been spoken. Though they have no doubt been punctuated improperly when quoted.
I knew I could count on you, Teppy!
TO BE WRONG.
If loving punctuation within quotation marks is wrong, I don't want to be right.
You can have some punctuation within quotation marks. You just can't have it all. Otherwise, what does a quote even mean? That's not what they said, why is it in quote marks? It's a mockery of verbatimness.
I am particularly appalled by the notion that usage on the Web could be used as the foundation of any grammar argument. That's a slippery slope to having "r" be an acceptable spelling for the third-person plural of to be.