'The Killer In Me'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
What the Brits said.
In good news: seems like a quieter day. Also? Fucked up situation at work might not be as fucked as I thought it'll be.
ION: I'll graduate soon (3 papers and one test to go; I can finish it by August). WTF do I do next?
...
OK, I know what I'll do next. I just don't the specifics yet. Which is confusing.
It's the time for crazy offers, folks. I wasn't ready for the year and this degree to end so soon!
(they say Logical Punctuation, I say TRAVESTY.
Truer words have never been spoken. Though they have no doubt been punctuated improperly when quoted.
I knew I could count on you, Teppy!
TO BE WRONG.
If loving punctuation within quotation marks is wrong, I don't want to be right.
You can have some punctuation within quotation marks. You just can't have it all. Otherwise, what does a quote even mean? That's not what they said, why is it in quote marks? It's a mockery of verbatimness.
I am particularly appalled by the notion that usage on the Web could be used as the foundation of any grammar argument. That's a slippery slope to having "r" be an acceptable spelling for the third-person plural of to be.
If loving punctuation within quotation marks is wrong, I don't want to be right.
Yes, well it's clear that you don't want to be right.
I don't see why it's a travesty. It's just what people are used to. The British way always made more sense to me.
That's a slippery slope to having "r" be an acceptable spelling for the third-person plural of to be.
It's Prince's fault.
Seriously, though--spoken usage can count in the evolution of language, or written in another media, just not on the internet?