Wash ,'Objects In Space'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, pandas, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Ginger is pretty much me!
Me too. I suspect mine was sort of a proto-feminist fascination with Dagny Taggart.
What I mean by #4 defaulting to #2 is somewhat like- I have no reason to believe I will be able to fly tomorrow, therefore, I probably won't.
Leif cracked me up last night when he referred to himself in the third-person. "That does not make the Leifster laugh!"
She may not have been making the face at you at all! Maybe she was just having a shitty day and happened to be making that face your way. (Signed, Gets Accused of "Giving Looks" When I'm Not Intending To)
My face just looks like that! I literally just posted in LJ about this very issue. Although I'm not generally looking someone up and down with Accidental Stank Face.
Trekistas.
Trekmeisters.
Trekalekadingdongs.
#4 defaulting to #2 is somewhat like- I have no reason to believe I will be able to fly tomorrow, therefore, I probably won't.
To me, #4 means that I don't care if I can fly tomorrow, since I was driving anyway.
That is not going to be good for my productivity.
Whoa. No kidding.
My face just looks like that!
Apparently mine does too, which is why I'm careful where I point it.
Well, except for when I'm randomly pointlessly smiling. Needless to say, I have to be careful what I do with those too. Even more careful, in fact.
The Google logo apparently has a 2 player option. Insert two coins.
#4 defaulting to #2 is somewhat like- I have no reason to believe I will be able to fly tomorrow, therefore, I probably won't.
To me, #2 implies that one has actually weighed the possibility. #4 carries no such implication. #2 is more like #1 than #4 - they're both answers to the same question, while #4 is potentially answering no question at all.