meara, I was going to SAY!
Wesley: Perhaps the whole point of this experiment is hair. Gunn: I vote he's not in charge.
'The Cautionary Tale of Numero Cinco'
Spike's Bitches 45: That sure as hell wasn't in the brochure.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
amyth - Aug 16, 2010 4:56:19 pm PDT #28792 of 30000
And none of us deserving the cruelty or the grace -- Leonard Cohen
sarameg - Aug 16, 2010 4:56:30 pm PDT #28793 of 30000
t not really here I'd be pretty shocked if there ISN'T a sushi place in or at the Pearl Harbor memorial. Hawaii has a HUGE ethnic japanese community. Has had long before Pearl Harbor was a historical event. In the 20s, they were almost half the population. t /not really here
askye - Aug 16, 2010 4:56:36 pm PDT #28794 of 30000
Thrive to spite them
It's okay for Sushi restaurants to be in hawaii, they just couldn't be 4 blocks from Pearl Harbor.
sarameg - Aug 16, 2010 4:57:52 pm PDT #28795 of 30000
Tell the moron to google Pearl Harbor sushi.
Dana - Aug 16, 2010 4:59:18 pm PDT #28796 of 30000
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
What about five blocks from Pearl Harbor?
Hil R. - Aug 16, 2010 5:01:50 pm PDT #28797 of 30000
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l
Elsie Dinsmore uses the passage "Ephraim is joined to idols: let him alone," to justify the position that grace is time-limited -- if you don't accept Jesus within a certain time frame, then he won't have you anymore. (OK, I don't really have anything useful to add to this conversation, but I'd never seen that interpretation anywhere else, and I asked a few Christian friends, who said they'd never heard it, either.)
His other argument is that this is the same as if a sushi restaurant opened right next to Pearl Harbor, it would be a provocation and disrespectful and should not be allowed.
That one actually kind of makes sense as an analogy, but I don't see why it shouldn't be allowed. It's not like a sushi restaurant is an arm of the WWII-era Japanese government.
askye - Aug 16, 2010 5:03:08 pm PDT #28798 of 30000
Thrive to spite them
Dana, Five blocks would be great, do you have an address?
Dana - Aug 16, 2010 5:04:05 pm PDT #28799 of 30000
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
Ha, no, it was rhetorical. But I'm tempted to google now.
Here, enter this in the Google Maps search box. "sushi loc: Pearl Harbour, HI"
sarameg - Aug 16, 2010 5:05:05 pm PDT #28800 of 30000
The Pacific Aviation Museum there doesn't have sushi on the menu, but teriaki beef and asian stir fry! Horrors! [link]
I'd be surprised if you couldn't get sushi in the AFB mess hall. Hell, you could get it at Ft. Hood...
ANYWAY. PEOPLE ON THE INTERNET ARE WRONG.
askye - Aug 16, 2010 5:05:50 pm PDT #28801 of 30000
Thrive to spite them
The argument goes something like - sure it's legal but it's disrespectful so it shouldn't be allowed.
Not legally blocked, just the people building the mosque/sushi restaurant shouldn't do it because it's in bad taste and so why it shouldn't be against the law it should be heavily discouraged from happening.