Lorne: Take care of yourself and ah, make sure fluffy is getting enough love. Gunn: Did he have anything? Fred: No. And who's fluffy? Are you fluffy? Gunn: He called me fluffy? Fred: He said make sure…wait. You don't think he was referring to anything of mine that's fluffy, do you? Because that would just be inappropriate.

'Conviction (1)'


Spike's Bitches 45: That sure as hell wasn't in the brochure.  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Pix - Jul 16, 2010 10:12:08 am PDT #25748 of 30000
The status is NOT quo.

I defer to Miss Manners...but I think a late thank you is better than no thank you at all, so I'll still send them. Honestly, part of it is that I didn't want to write them all myself, and Drew has been out of town most of the last six months. Not an excuse, but an explanation. Anyway, will soon be a non-issue since I plan to take care of it this week.

I have nothing to add about porn. I tend to be pro-porn but anti-industry, as many of you seem to be.


smonster - Jul 16, 2010 10:23:31 am PDT #25749 of 30000
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.

I'm sorry if I took a fun conversation and made it serious unnecessarily.

I think this is Buffista Apology #24. (also, no. not imho, anyways)


SailAweigh - Jul 16, 2010 10:48:22 am PDT #25750 of 30000
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb

I, for one, have throroughly enjoyed following along. Work was way to busy yesterday for me to chime in, but I have to agree with the pr0n-yay, industry-no. I'm at work or I'd link to one of my favorite tumblrs, sex is not the enemy. Gorgeous pictures, explicit and not, but what comes through is the fact that all these people are there willingly and enjoying the hell out of themselves. It's beautiful.

I think what I need, though, is a clear line between erotica and pr0n. What makes the difference? It's something I've never really thought about before and I'm curious to hear what others have to say. Is there a legal definition? Is it, again, in the eye of the beholder? Does it have to do with consent issues?


Aims - Jul 16, 2010 10:49:24 am PDT #25751 of 30000
Shit's all sorts of different now.

erotica and pr0n.

Chicken and feathers. Something.


amych - Jul 16, 2010 10:50:06 am PDT #25752 of 30000
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

I always figure erotica = that which is classy enough for my tastes.


Aims - Jul 16, 2010 10:51:09 am PDT #25753 of 30000
Shit's all sorts of different now.

It seems like erotica charges more for internet access than porn.

I've heard.


Volans - Jul 16, 2010 10:52:53 am PDT #25754 of 30000
move out and draw fire

is a clear line between erotica and pr0n

This may be Buffista conversation #138.


tommyrot - Jul 16, 2010 10:55:32 am PDT #25755 of 30000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Maybe pr0n is just to get you horny/help you get off, and while erotica can do that too, it appeals to other parts of one's brain as well?

Or maybe erotica is more artsy-fartsy....


tommyrot - Jul 16, 2010 10:57:28 am PDT #25756 of 30000
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Actually, isn't the legal definition of pornography "an appeal to prurient interest" that lacks any other redeeming feature?

eta: Or is that the definition of obscenity rather than pornography?


Connie Neil - Jul 16, 2010 11:00:50 am PDT #25757 of 30000
brillig

My (flippant) bitch about het porn is that nobody seems to really be enjoying the sex. It's not an aerobics video, people!

My favorite gay video has two guys who, if they're not together, definitely enjoy each other. They're smiling at each other and making eye contact. Plus one guy has his socks on the whole time, which is weirdly appealing.