It seems like erotica charges more for internet access than porn.
I've heard.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
It seems like erotica charges more for internet access than porn.
I've heard.
is a clear line between erotica and pr0n
This may be Buffista conversation #138.
Maybe pr0n is just to get you horny/help you get off, and while erotica can do that too, it appeals to other parts of one's brain as well?
Or maybe erotica is more artsy-fartsy....
Actually, isn't the legal definition of pornography "an appeal to prurient interest" that lacks any other redeeming feature?
eta: Or is that the definition of obscenity rather than pornography?
My (flippant) bitch about het porn is that nobody seems to really be enjoying the sex. It's not an aerobics video, people!
My favorite gay video has two guys who, if they're not together, definitely enjoy each other. They're smiling at each other and making eye contact. Plus one guy has his socks on the whole time, which is weirdly appealing.
Chicken and feathers. Something.
I thought that was the difference between "kinky" and "perverted."
And tommyrot, yes, it's the legal definition of obscenity.
My (flippant) bitch about het porn is that nobody seems to really be enjoying the sex. It's not an aerobics video, people!
Totally. Like there's a fitness instructor off-camera who every few minutes blows a whistle and says, "Change positions!"
Erotica has a better soundtrack?
I thought the legal definition of porn was "I know it when I see it."
I thought the legal definition of porn was "I know it when I see it."
That's what I thought!