My definition of choice: [link]
I tried to read that and, to my shame, didn't understand half the terms. I hate running into subjects that make me feel stupid.
'Bring On The Night'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
My definition of choice: [link]
I tried to read that and, to my shame, didn't understand half the terms. I hate running into subjects that make me feel stupid.
I was all in favor of post modernism, until I discovered that post-structuralism (and sometime strict structuralism) and phenomenology are often enough to make clear statements (which is exactly the difference, so I've heard, between Lacan and Derrida). And Occam's razor and all, I'd take that. The tendency to go and say "but nooooo, these days reality iz soooo complicated you can't really say that it's true in my snow flakey individual case", is often the case of the Snow Flake which didn't read enough, IME.
I tried to read that and, to my shame, didn't understand half the terms. I hate running into subjects that make me feel stupid.
If you can, try read the first few pages out of "We Have Never Been Modern". It's clear and pretty simple writing.
I can also scan them for you, if you'd like. Hell, I encourage everybody to go and read it.
The Cartoon History of the Modern World had a very useful page that gave a rundown of what constituted Modern: education for the masses, democracy, capitalism, et al. When is Post-Modernism supposed to have become a major influence, and what does it entail? Is it the breakdown of the influences that defined Modernism?
That looks interesting, Shir. I'm glad to have the recommendation of something to read on the subject.
How women from other countries refer to "that time of the month"
I think that this is interesting. My BFF works with Native Americans, and their euphemism is "on the moon", which I like.
I'm not an enormous fan of post-modernism, as in the school of philosophy, but I think there's much value in the concept that we're living in an entirely new stage of modernity that may or may not turn out to be something other. Post-modernity is different from post-modernism (although I've nothing against it being called 'late modernism' or similar). Bauman's 'Liquid Modernity' does some fantastic analysis of our current age of rapid change.
I'm bored with living in the modern era. Can we skip ahead to the singularity already?
(ION, I seem to be letting my preschooler play with my iPhone. He's totally into the bubble wrap game.)
there's a bubble wrap game? off to the app store i go...