Remind me what's the best way to shut up annoying-don't-have-a-clue-stick relatives, in a "polite" (read: passive-aggressive) way?
"Would you like some more wine?"
Dawn ,'Sleeper'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Remind me what's the best way to shut up annoying-don't-have-a-clue-stick relatives, in a "polite" (read: passive-aggressive) way?
"Would you like some more wine?"
I find enthusiastic agreement works well, i.e. "You should be thinking about getting married." "Yes, I should!"
I like this approach. A LOT.
"I'll think about it."(And mostly, what a big jerk you are for bringing it up)
Death is Not An Option:
Eric Cantor
John Boehner
Bart Stupak
I guess Cantor...he looks the most like someone I'd actually be into. But then he talks. Oy.
I find enthusiastic agreement works well, i.e. "You should be thinking about getting married." "Yes, I should!"
Sadly, I don't think this would work for, say, Polter-Cow.
"I'll think about it."
How about, "That's one point of view."
You've been watching Phineas and Ferb, haven't you Scrappy? That's a running gag on the show.
Cantor's a handsome guy. Also, not UNNATURALLY ORANGE.
Maybe I should reply with "And you should really read Simmel. I got a copy of "The Problems of the Philosophy of History" right here!".
(Hey. I wish more people were reading it.)
I haven't, Scola, but it sounds like I should!
Maybe I should reply with "And you should really read Simmel. I got a copy of "The Problems of the Philosophy of History" right here!".
Another approach with promise. Bury them in jargon and conundrums until they are the ones looking around wildly for an escape.