Actually, what was I talking about with four? I'm going to take a devastation hard line and say nothing under 70% is devastation, and everything lesser should have a different word. And I don't think 70% decimation is significantly different from 90% decimation, all told.
Natter 64: Yes, we still need you
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Fair enough. I don't have a hard line for devastation - I know it when I see it, I think. But in much the same way that FREE is so much more appealing than 10 for a penny, I think referring to 100% destruction as decimation is so much more wrong than any other misuse of the term.
Here is how ridiculous I am: I feel like my cat isn't quite right, but the memory of how much bloodwork cost made me wonder how long it's been since he was at the vet. I couldn't find the paperwork anywhere, but luckily I posted about it! As I knew I would have. It was last November, so that seems reasonable.
I totally do that.
I don't particularly mind about misuse of decimation, but as soon as you attach any number to it (aside from, you know, ten) you've crossed the line from casual misuse into wrongity wrong wrong.
I got my new tattoo done! Looks good. Am happy!
PHOTOS, MA'AM.
I got my new tattoo done! Looks good. Am happy!
Yay! I probably missed a discussion about this while I was away. Is it something that's been in the works for a while?
pix or it didn't happen!
Allyson, where on your body did you get it?
oh man. I'm exhausted. 50+ kids in one period is killing me.
Back of my neck. It's just beautiful. Kristen says she will take a pic.