their identity would be posted though
I think you forgot a "not" in there.
But there's enough info posted that in a small community, people might be able to figure out who it was.
River: You gave up everything you had. Simon: [Chinese] Everything I have is right here.
'Safe'
Natter 64: Yes, we still need you
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
tommyrot - Dec 18, 2009 5:52:06 am PST #25976 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Aims - Dec 18, 2009 5:52:54 am PST #25977 of 30001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
We're not trying to embarrass anybody, hurt anybody or make anybody's identities known. That's not the purpose of the legislation," the Republican lawmaker says. "We want to collect hard data that can be a useful tool in helping prevent future unwanted pregnancies."
TEACH BIRTH CONTROL AS WELL AS ABSTINENCE IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS YOU SANCTIMONIOUS TOOL.
Ahem.
Gudanov - Dec 18, 2009 5:54:07 am PST #25978 of 30001
Coding and Sleeping
I think you forgot a "not" in there.
Yes, that's an important word. Edited.
Connie Neil - Dec 18, 2009 5:54:28 am PST #25979 of 30001
brillig
Because if you (rabid anti-abortionist) stick to your guns on all points, you have to admit that you don't really give a fuck about women and that you secretly believe that rape victims were "asking for it" and incest isn't so bad. And then there goes your re-election.
It's the rabid women anti-choicers who disturb me. But I've heard some of them talk, and I truly think they believe that rape and incest only happens to "those" kinds of people, and if they were deserving folk, God would have protected them, and since they ended up pregnant it shows God's opinion of them, and if God has abandoned them, so should the laws.
Amy - Dec 18, 2009 5:55:12 am PST #25980 of 30001
Because books.
Aims, did you get my email from a day or so ago? I need your address!
Aims - Dec 18, 2009 5:55:45 am PST #25981 of 30001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
I thought I sent it to you! Crappity!! Resent in a minnit.
Amy - Dec 18, 2009 5:57:29 am PST #25982 of 30001
Because books.
Excellent.
tommyrot - Dec 18, 2009 5:58:18 am PST #25983 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Ooh. Go NASA!
Exclusive: Obama Backs New Launcher and Bigger NASA Budget
President Barack Obama will ask Congress next year to fund a new heavy-lift launcher to take humans to the moon, asteroids, and the moons of Mars, ScienceInsider has learned. The president chose the new direction for the U.S. human space flight program Wednesday at a White House meeting with NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, according to officials familiar with the discussion. NASA would receive an additional $1 billion in 2011 both to get the new launcher on track and to bolster the agency’s fleet of robotic Earth-monitoring spacecraft.
Aims - Dec 18, 2009 5:58:54 am PST #25984 of 30001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
Joe is going to pee when he hears that.
msbelle - Dec 18, 2009 5:59:22 am PST #25985 of 30001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
I am going to stand by my, I HATE PEOPLE statement.
Stupidheads against gov't involvement in healthcare - THEN YOU GET NO SAY ABOUT ABORTIONS!!!! Same stupidheads that argue against big gov't getting all up in their grill wrt guns/safety issues/education - THEN YOU GET NO SAY ABOUT MARRIAGE!
YOU JACKHOLES!