edit: question was misdirected, answer not needed.
Tara ,'First Date'
Natter 64: Yes, we still need you
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Have I mentioned that I've had Too Much Wine tonight?
I'm now earwormed.
And have taken my happy pain pill for the evening, so who knows what the hell will be going through my mind in about fifteen minutes.
"Maxwell Edison, majoring in medicine..."
Wait, Barb is right about what? Are we still talking Beatles?
(um, for clarity, Joe played me the song today but I'd never heard it before. I think it's a little creepy.)
I'm so chatty tonight. I have...an exciting week of staying home with Frisco to look forward to. Oh, and of course because this is how motherhood works, I have a big (to me) hearing in court on Wednesday. Im ready enough but it will befour days of boredom and one day of wishmh I could be in two places at once.
It is definitely a creepy song.
Good luck on Wednesday!
But such a happy, bouncy tune!
So, Disney has given Tinkerbell a new outfit. It has sleeves, and tights. And, it seems, seeing less of Tinkerbell's skin will turn your daughters gay? Or something? [link]
Oh...dear. Hil, that woman made my brain hurt (the one the blogger was quoting, obviously, not the blogger herself). The idea that Tinkerbell "always" looked like a '50s pinup when J.M. Barrie's book was first illustrated by Francis Donkin Bedford in 1911 is...well...a bit of a logic-breaker.
Not to mention that the new outfit Tink is wearing is hardly androgynous. Sheesh, I suspect that plenty of hetero men would think that's a sexy outfit, too. I do, but since I'm a queer bi freak, clearly I'm not a reliable source and am trying to infect the children with teh gay.
Not Safe For Work
(but not obscene either, just flashes of nudity and general debauchery circa 1970)