Jayne (Husband): Oh, I think you might wanna reconsider that last part. See, I married me a powerful ugly creature. Mal (Wife): How can you say that? How can you shame me in front of new people? Jayne (Husband): If I could make you purtier, I would. Mal (Wife): You are not the man I met a year ago.

'Our Mrs. Reynolds'


Jossverse 1: Emotional Resonance & Rocket Launchers  

TV, movies, web media--this thread is the home for any Joss projects that don't already have their own threads, such as Dr. Horrible.


Connie Neil - Jan 13, 2015 5:46:09 am PST #4840 of 5827
brillig

But, Matt, there was a war on. Which is a phrase used often to excuse non-standard behavior. A big push after the war was to "get back to normal." The agency that women used was considered something borrowed, and lots of people, men and women, assumed that most women would be happy to give up the "burden" and get back to their proper work. Women going into the factories and military was considered a sad commentary on the hardships of war, not a chance to show what a woman could do. Many, many people breathed a sigh of relief that the old roles could be reassumed. People being people, there were lots of folks who liked the wartime roles, but in general, society did not approve.

In the SSR, there may be people thinking Peggy is being wasted, but on the whole, I see it as a situation where the men have come back from war and are expecting to have the useful jobs for themselves. The women were placeholders, no matter how competent they were.


sj - Jan 14, 2015 4:34:27 pm PST #4841 of 5827
"There are few hours in life more agreeable than the hour dedicated to the ceremony known as afternoon tea."

I did watch Agent Carter last night, but I was having trouble concentrating so I don't really remember much of it.


Calli - Jan 15, 2015 3:56:52 am PST #4842 of 5827
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

Yeah, it looks like I was wrong earlier. Angie is a waitress at an automat. Guess it's just semiautomatic.


Jon B. - Jan 15, 2015 5:23:15 am PST #4843 of 5827
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

I was confused by something in this week's episode. During his interrogation, Jarvis didn't start sweating until the "traitor" thing was brought up. It seemed like the SSR guys were threatening to use that info to get him deported. Why then was it such a big deal that Peggy "accidentally" revealed they were lying about the lost missing car police report?


SailAweigh - Jan 15, 2015 5:27:00 am PST #4844 of 5827
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb

I didn't get that either, Jon.


Polter-Cow - Jan 15, 2015 7:25:41 am PST #4845 of 5827
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

I was very confused about what happened with Peggy and the report. I think because that was what they were ostensibly holding him for, they had to release him then?


sumi - Jan 15, 2015 7:35:39 am PST #4846 of 5827
Art Crawl!!!

P-C, that must be it. And the traitor thing was just a threat.


Steph L. - Jan 15, 2015 7:40:54 am PST #4847 of 5827
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

Yeah, the only thing they were holding him for was suspicion of being at the refinery the night it went kaboom, because they found the bumper and license plate. He reported the car as stolen, so that report would basically "prove" he couldn't have been the driver the night the refinery went kaboom.

The SSR guys had the report but *said* they couldn't find it; lack of the report would mean lack of "proof" of his innocence.

Peggy knew they had the report, so she cooked up the scheme to come in with the forms Big Boss had to sign, and she picked up the police report with them, and then brought them back in front of Jarvis, so that Jarvis knew they had proof he wasn't at the refinery.


Polter-Cow - Jan 15, 2015 7:53:49 am PST #4848 of 5827
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

I saw her pick up a report but I didn't follow all the logic there. Thanks for breaking it down!

(I was also confused because it didn't seem like the lack of police report was an issue because they already claimed not to believe the report, that it was an obvious false alibi.)


Steph L. - Jan 15, 2015 8:01:23 am PST #4849 of 5827
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

they already claimed not to believe the report, that it was an obvious false alibi.

I guess the fact there was an actual documented report of theft is more legally defensible than Jarvis just saying "Uh, yeah, it was stolen a while back. I swear!"

I mean, the SSR guys definitely didn't believe it (because it WAS false), but it's still enough concrete proof to cover his ass.