So I went back to see Coraline again before it went away, but this time in 2-D.
It's much, much more spectacular in 3-D. It's still a great movie, but the hyperreal intensity of the 3-D version is just absolutely transporting.
Three scenes in particular were much less in 2-D:
1.
The first time they go to the garden.
2.
When Coraline falls into the Other!Mother's web.
3.
The Van Gogh starry night background when the lost souls escape.
But it wasn't just the tour-de-force set pieces that were less intense. The whole movie lost a lot of depth. The pairing of 3-D imagery with the actual, physical sets of stop-motion animation was used beautifully.
So. Still a great movie, but much more beautiful and intense in 3-D.
my expectations may be unrealistically high.
this is what I'm afraid of. Today my cashier said, "I don't read about the movies." Dude. You've been walking by the poster for a month.
If I were the cashier, it would be hysterical amnesia, and quite forgiveable, of course.
New Images from Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.
I wasn't excited about Ridley Scott's
Robin Hood
but I just heard Brian Helgeland did extensive script rewrites. I loved his
Knight's Tale.
I wonder if this will have a similar flavor.
Is that the one where the same actor is playing Robin Hood and the Sheriff of Nottingham?
I'm not sure. There's no one currently cast as the sheriff. Russell Crowe is Robin.
just watched 17 Again. it's kind of adorable. as is Zac Efron when he isn't candy-coated and Disneyfied.
Oh. Is that what my students were on about.
Finally saw Coraline today. Sadly in 2-D, but that's my own fault for not getting to it sooner. LOVED IT. But still sad I missed it in 3-D. Also, I want a Bat!Scottish Terrier.