I'd have been similarly surprised to see Dark Knight nominated for adapted, since the story is new. Any sequel is using existing characters--would they all fall under an adapted rubric?
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
And all of the dialogue in The Hurt Locker was waaaay on the nose.
I find this to be true of a lot of war movies.
Any sequel is using existing characters--would they all fall under an adapted rubric?
All sequels are automatically considered as adapted.
And all of the dialogue in The Hurt Locker was waaaay on the nose.
I'm confused. I use "on the nose" to mean accurate, but that doesn't seem to be what you're saying here.
I think he means that it was very deliberate and obvious and anvilicious, like "Hey, you're angry! You're yelling and screaming because you're angry!" (I haven't seen it yet, and I assume the dialogue is better than that.)
So, basically, telling instead of showing.
A DIVERSION!
Indeed that's what I mean. The Hurt Locker told everything that it showed.
As opposed to Avatar?
Oh heck no, but you have to admit that's a pretty low bar. I should say that I haven't seen Avatar, but in my defense, I have seen Dances With Wolves.
As opposed to Avatar?
Avatar isn't up for a screenplay award, though. The BP nom there is strictly on a Cinema! As! Spectacle! level, which I think is a valid lens through which to judge a film.
a Cinema! As! Spectacle! level, which I think is a valid lens through which to judge a film.
Isn't that what Cinematography is for? Visual Effects to a lesser degree?