I'm looking for instances where a movie remake is superior than the original. I know the classic examples are The Maltese Falcon and His Girl Friday, but I'm especially wondering if any films during the present Hollywood Remake Glut have been worthwhile.
JZ will make the case that the Julia Ormond/Harrison Ford
Sabrina
is better written and cast than the original with Audrey.
I prefer the Winona Ryder/Susan Sarandon Little Women over the other feature film versions, but it's more a remake of the book than of any of the previous films.
I prefer the Winona Ryder/Susan Sarandon Little Women over the other feature film versions, but it's more a remake of the book than of any of the previous films.
I was thinking about Pride & Prejudice, but it's the same issue.
(See also, Peter Jackson LotR)
I fell asleep during both iterations of Solaris, but the only thing I could say was definitively better about the Soderbergh version was that it was significantly shorter.
I haven't seen
Inglourious Basterds,
but the original Inglorious Bastards was not good.
Huh, Safari's spellcheck doesn't mind 'basterd" but flags "inglourious"
Do folks know there's gonna be an American version of
Let the Right One In,
directed by the guy who did Cloverfield? (It's called Let Me In.)
It's not so much a remake of the original movie as a new version of the book.
I preferred The Birdcage to La Cage Aux Folles.
This site has a pretty good list:
[link]
[eta: I take that back - that list includes Vanilla Sky. PTUI.]
Will it still be boring?
Your question is based on a false premise.
eta: I take that back
I was gonna say. Pelham 1-2-3? Really?
To answer my own question, original Casino Royale was a mess.