Superheros whose origin stories NEVER need to be told again: Spider-Man, Superman, Batman.
WE ALREADY KNOW. Just stop it with the spider exploding planet goddamn alley and the pearls falling to the ground JUST STAAAAAAHP.
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Superheros whose origin stories NEVER need to be told again: Spider-Man, Superman, Batman.
WE ALREADY KNOW. Just stop it with the spider exploding planet goddamn alley and the pearls falling to the ground JUST STAAAAAAHP.
I'd like it if they kept Andrew Garfield in the role. He's certainly not to blame for the problems with the last Sony movie.
Matt, I agree. I really like Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker.
If they feel it's necessary to explain Spider-Man's origins it should be something simple and off hand. Almost a joke about accidents with radioactive lab experiments and a reference to Parker and Banner having something in common or maybe they should start a club (I could see Tony saying something like that). Then there it's done.
I was by no means arguing we need to see his origin again. I agree with Teppy as to those heroes already having their origins ingrained in pop-culture. I was just expressing a preference for ditching "the truth about Peter's parents/Spider-man is constantly seeking Uncle Ben's killer" nonsense from the recent movies. Too many shades of Batman in that latter part.
I'm sure I've said this before, but the Spectacular Spider-man cartoon proved you can just skip the origin tale (or at least reduce it to a few images in the opening credits) and just hit the ground running. And BTAS did the same thing a decade earlier with Batman. Both shows had flashbacks to their respective origins later on, but they were relevant to the story being told at the time.
I don't hate the thought of a Marvel Spiderman movie. But it looks like it'll be pushing Captain Marvel and the Black Panther movies back a year each for it, which does not thrill me. It would be cool if they went with the Mike Morales version of Spidey.
I don't think we'll see a Spidey origin story from the MCU. They know better. Especially since they're bringing Spidey into an Marvel movie first. We didn't get a rehash of the hulk's origin story in The Avengers, so I don't see them giving an origin for a supporting character, especially one as iconic as him.
It will be interesting to see how they integrate him if they actually DO stick with it being the same Spidey as the last movies, though. Why didn't he help in Avengers?
Why didn't he help in Avengers?
The Toast addresses this: [link] (humor, but still). (Okay, not Spider-Man, but still funny.) (Disclaimers over.)
"Hulk out with your bulk out!"
excellent. I read all of that in their voices.
The best thing about the Spider-Man news is that now they can have J.K. Simmons as J. Jonah Jameson. I imagine the Daily Bugle has a few things to say about Tony Stark...