Just about three hours. Which isn't as long as it sounds, considering that there are six storylines in play.

(That's a lie, it's very long, and it feels long. But in a good way that makes you want to use the word "epic.")

Speed Racer was long in the sense that it would have been a much better film if they cut at least 45 minutes from it.

Hello Tailor has a killer review of Skyfall; it makes me want to run right out and see it: [link]

Ack, thanks-- Yes, there are spoilers.

note: above review has spoilers!

Sorry, le n--I tend not to think of spoilers w/rt Bond, but there is one specific thing I wish I hadn't known...

it doesn't really bother me, but I am warning others.

Okay, having seen the movie, that is NOT the spoiler I was worried it was. Whew.

went to see Brave today. Yay, dollar movies! Only one crying baby, who was promptly removed to the lobby, and several pre-teen girls--a pack? horde? scurry? giggle?--who gasped in the right places, laughed appropriately, and weren't annoying.

A Disney movie with both parents! Amazing! and what a very pretty movie.

We saw Paranorman last night and really enjoyed it. I know it's packed with horror references and the few I got, I liked--I know a must hav missed a lot, since I'm not normally a horror aficionado. Great, idiosyncratic visual style, too.

Cloud Atlas:

I saw the movie last night. I am still early in the book. I didn't get a chance to finish it before seeing this movie. So take this as the reaction of someone who didn't read the book and really didn't know what the book was about.

The movie intertwines six stories throughout. Of the six stories, one really stayed with me. One I thought was overly trite and one made me really uneasy.

The other 3 - a) funny but bizarre; b) interesting but really improbable and went on a bit too long; c) also went on a bit too long and I did not care at all for its epilogue.

(these comments are not in order of the stories)

It is a long movie and I started feeling it after about 2 hours. I wish this had an intermission at about the 1:45 or 2 hour mark. I thought it was an ambitious movie, made a bit confusing due to the makeup jobs. This confusion probably didn't need to be. By confusion I mean that some were trying to map that the same actor was the same "soul" across each of the stories, and I don't think we are meant to understand that. Problem is that some actors played mostly bad guys throughout, while others played mostly good guys so it is easy in some ways to make that assumption, but I believe it to be in error.

I kind of wish the directors/writer had approached this movie like "Night on Earth" where the stories were vignettes. I get the interest regarding portraying the stories as interconnected (and they are), but putting together thematic connections might have been easier if they allowed themselves more freedom. You can have thematic connections that are more symbolic than the literal connections they mad here.

I enjoyed the movie very much, but Beau and I agree that we aren't sure whether to call this a "very good" movie. It engages you mostly on an emotional level. It is an R movie for good reason. The R is mostly for violence and one sex scene. The violence though is kind of shocking and I'm no wilting flower. Every time it occurred, I gasped. I have to give the directors a lot of credit in this regard, they do know how to shock and surprise with regard to brutality.

but because of some trite areas I am not sure I felt this movie was an elevation - if that makes sense. Capably done, interesting work, enjoyable and entertaining, but would I say: "this is great?" Probably not. Beau wants to see it again. I do too, but I kind of feel like I want to read the book THEN see the movie again.

for those who have read the book:

Is it the case that there is a character in each story who has a comet tattoo and are we to understand that this soul gains agency in each "reincarnation?" Is that what the reader is to get out of this tale - among other things?