Just got back from Argo.
That was a lot of tension for something where I knew going in how it ended.
'Safe'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Just got back from Argo.
That was a lot of tension for something where I knew going in how it ended.
Argo was amazing, I thought. Definite nits to pick, but overall I was really impressed.
Skyfall is also pretty amazing, which was a great relief after Quantum of Boredom. But this movie gets it right - the action is AWESOME (I'm not supposed to give spoilers, but it's a James Bond film, so I don't think it spoils anything to say some of the action scenes are chases and some of the chases are on motorcycles and that some of the motorcycles go places that motorcycles do not normally go), and there is just the right mix of old-campy-bond and new-serious-Bond. The quips are well-placed and actually funny!
Because it's the franchise's 50th anniversary, there are all kinds of winks and nods to classic Bondisms. (I think maybe Javier Bardem's hair is supposed to be a nod to Blofeld's cat...)
Even the song is good! Adele FTW!
I recommend seeing it in the biggest theater possible. It's not IMAX (or 3D, thank god) but there are certain scenes that just cry out for a ginormous screen.
I also dug Argo. It really grabs you and doesn't let go.
I saw Argo and it was really really good. Edge of my seat tension and good pacing. I wonder what kind of Oscar nominations it will get. It seems like it should get some.
Screenplay, I assume. Maybe some of the design ones.
Who'd have thought that Affleck would have been the director out of the Good Will Hunting boys?
Basically, I mean he is tall and has a large jaw, and that stereotype works against ya when you're kinda pretty too.
However, he is hiding the jaw under a beard. This might not be coincidental...
I thought they did a really good job of making everyone look like they were from the era. There wasn't really a lead actress and I was wondering if there was a supporting actor nod if it would go to what's his name from Breaking Bad or to John Goodman. Goodman got more exposure as being the supporting actor.
Hey, what about Arkin? He was totally wonderful.
Gah. I'm being driven slowly insane by the "Why didn't he shoot off his hand instead?" Looper question. He didn't, because the movie is broken. What we are shown early on about that possibility doesn't make sense--sure if right now you cut off my hand, I live 30 years with no hand. I have time to get used to it. I get a prosthetic, and get a little more used to working with the left, no? So why, instead, is it happening instantaneously 30 years later?
What am I missing there?
Also, when I pause to think about the timeline where Joe kills his old self-- how does that actually happen? Or why? I mean, apart from to make there be a movie. At what point does Old Joe just go meekly to his death?
What am I missing there?
Did you read the Q&A with Rian Johnson? He addressed it by saying that if Joe shot off his hand, then Old Joe would just switch to his left and shoot Cid anyway. Also something something redemptive arc, probably.