I also dug Argo. It really grabs you and doesn't let go.
I'd rather stay home and watch television. It's often funnier than killing stuff.
Anya ,'Dirty Girls'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Scrappy - Oct 15, 2012 6:41:44 am PDT #22681 of 30000
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
askye - Oct 15, 2012 2:42:00 pm PDT #22682 of 30000
Thrive to spite them
I saw Argo and it was really really good. Edge of my seat tension and good pacing. I wonder what kind of Oscar nominations it will get. It seems like it should get some.
Jessica - Oct 15, 2012 4:36:15 pm PDT #22683 of 30000
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
Screenplay, I assume. Maybe some of the design ones.
§ ita § - Oct 15, 2012 4:45:43 pm PDT #22684 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Who'd have thought that Affleck would have been the director out of the Good Will Hunting boys?
Basically, I mean he is tall and has a large jaw, and that stereotype works against ya when you're kinda pretty too.
However, he is hiding the jaw under a beard. This might not be coincidental...
askye - Oct 15, 2012 5:00:03 pm PDT #22685 of 30000
Thrive to spite them
I thought they did a really good job of making everyone look like they were from the era. There wasn't really a lead actress and I was wondering if there was a supporting actor nod if it would go to what's his name from Breaking Bad or to John Goodman. Goodman got more exposure as being the supporting actor.
Scrappy - Oct 16, 2012 6:38:31 am PDT #22686 of 30000
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
Hey, what about Arkin? He was totally wonderful.
§ ita § - Oct 16, 2012 7:25:29 am PDT #22687 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Gah. I'm being driven slowly insane by the "Why didn't he shoot off his hand instead?" Looper question. He didn't, because the movie is broken. What we are shown early on about that possibility doesn't make sense--sure if right now you cut off my hand, I live 30 years with no hand. I have time to get used to it. I get a prosthetic, and get a little more used to working with the left, no? So why, instead, is it happening instantaneously 30 years later?
What am I missing there?
Also, when I pause to think about the timeline where Joe kills his old self-- how does that actually happen? Or why? I mean, apart from to make there be a movie. At what point does Old Joe just go meekly to his death?
Polter-Cow - Oct 16, 2012 7:28:21 am PDT #22688 of 30000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
What am I missing there?
Did you read the Q&A with Rian Johnson? He addressed it by saying that if Joe shot off his hand, then Old Joe would just switch to his left and shoot Cid anyway. Also something something redemptive arc, probably.
§ ita § - Oct 16, 2012 7:39:36 am PDT #22689 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
No, I understand that entirely. What I don't understand is why the future people are suddenly supposed to find themselves limbless, as opposed to dealing with a 3 decade old injury to which they've accommodated, possibly with prosthetics, over all this time. Why was the other guy surprised and unprepared?
askye - Oct 16, 2012 8:31:49 am PDT #22690 of 30000
Thrive to spite them
Arkin was great too.