I had to giggle when
Blake enters the old batcave with Bruce's will ringing in my ears. The manor and grounds are deeded to the city with the understanding that they will never be sold or altered in any way.
It just made sense to me that
the stipulations were to protect the underground lair
.
Poor,
Blake, he won't ever be able to upgrade the Batcave!
How could he even begin to afford it? There are so many reasons that model is unsustainable, I don't even know where to start.
My mind did bounce straight to "Winchester alternate revenue streams" which is just no good for anyone.
Who doesn't like gay porn, that is.
Maybe
Bruce buried some treasure in there for him to find.
How could he even begin to afford it? There are so many reasons that model is unsustainable, I don't even know where to start.
This was exactly my thought, too. But then, the entire
fiscal stability/instability portion of the program seemed based on profits gleaned from handwavium mining all along
.
We finally saw TDKR today. Slipped in right as the movie started, so no clue what previews there were. I also finally caught up in this thread, reading through the whitefont. I found myself nodding my head along with the majority of the comments.
For those who have seen Batman Begins more recently than I have (or who have better memories) this probably won't be as cool, but someone
edited together the scenes where Bruce Wayne and John Blake discover the Batcave and posted it on YouTube: [spoilery link]
The more I think about those being the same places (it's totally obvious now--I accept that), the less I like the end. It's irritating me.
The Hobbit will now be three films instead of two: [link]
Glee!!! More movies for Christmas!