What was its threesomeness like? I am sure I saw an interview where Blake said that the two guys had a relationship with each other, not just with her. Does it count as poly, not just cheating? And if poly was everyone multiplying, not just her?
Up until the punching, it was a real nice party.
Kaylee ,'Shindig'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
§ ita § - Jul 09, 2012 9:17:04 am PDT #21557 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Scrappy - Jul 09, 2012 10:09:12 am PDT #21558 of 30000
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
They sell it that they both sleep with her but not each other, although they "love" each other. If the dudes HAD been fucking, that would have made the film a little more interesting to me.
§ ita § - Jul 09, 2012 10:33:21 am PDT #21559 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
If they'd done that, I might have gone and seen it, despite my severe lack of like for Travolta (I'm curious to see if Kitsch will pay off, am curious if blank slate Lively needs ever bring anything other than a blank slate to work in the morning (she's that kind of pretty enough that--maybe not. It would be an easy paycheque of sorts, but fragile.).
Were there at least sloppy seconds? In deed if not in words? PLEASE???
Matt the Bruins fan - Jul 09, 2012 10:59:38 am PDT #21560 of 30000
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
They don't ever show the guys doing anything with each other without O in the middle, but Salma's character kind of calls out that Blake's is the third wheel in the relationship. And Chon has a line about telling Ben he loves him (or vice versa, I forget which) that morning whose tone implies that it wasn't said over the breakfast table.
Scrappy - Jul 09, 2012 11:58:01 am PDT #21561 of 30000
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
I hated that Lively's character was, well, pretty much nonexistent. Being pretty and having sex seemd to be the extent of it. These two guys are totes in love with her, but there's nobody home.
§ ita § - Jul 11, 2012 11:48:58 am PDT #21562 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Consuela - Jul 11, 2012 12:15:26 pm PDT #21563 of 30000
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
I don't see how anyone can make that into a movie. Granted, I haven't read it, but isn't the most important part of it the sex? Or is this going to be the first mainstream blockbuster with an NC-17 rating?
§ ita § - Jul 11, 2012 12:23:11 pm PDT #21564 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Hmm. That raises a question. Which is the most popular NC-17 movie? And not over time, but in the initial release. And how does one phrase that google search?
I feel like Box Office Mojo should just volunteer this information to me and save me the effort.
Amy - Jul 11, 2012 12:35:28 pm PDT #21565 of 30000
Because books.
Well, 9 1/2 Weeks was all about sex, and pretty graphic for its time.
There's also a lot you can do with the sort of doorway scene - - you show one of them tied up, or one of them with a whip in hand, and then you cut away and leave the rest to imagination.
Amy - Jul 11, 2012 12:45:12 pm PDT #21566 of 30000
Because books.
It's not initial release, but I'm getting Showgirls ($20 million lifetime) and then Henry and June ($11.5 million) by a pretty wide margin.