Jayne ,'Ariel'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I love Laura, although I do agree that the Price casting throws you out of the picture for a bit.
Though he does make a superlative red herring in compensation for the seeming miscasting of the role (though I think that's only retrospective - at the time I don't think it was such odd casting).
Though he does make a superlative red herring in compensation for the seeming miscasting of the role (though I think that's only retrospective - at the time I don't think it was such odd casting).
I think I remember hearing commentary to this effect. Maybe on the "Out of the Past" film noir podcast?
Nate Silver predicts the Oscars: [link]
Interesting, but, having seen
The Reader,
he's so wrong about this:
Most of the major awards in the Supporting Actress category have been won by Kate Winslet for The Reader—a role the Academy misguidedly considers a lead.
I don't know how that role could ever be considered "supporting".
We had friends over this weekend who had never see The Princess Bride (or read it, but they don't read). Now, I realize I may be speaking blasphemy here, but there may be room for a remake.
The script is great, the performances ranged from really good to freaking awesome, the casting was good, the cheesy-fairy-tale look was good. But the pacing. Oh the pacing. Ponderous. Epochal. Like a drip of molasses caught in amber on the back of a narcoleptic tortoise.
Also, the Mark Knopfler soundtrack hasn't aged well.
Maybe the film just needs to be recut and re-scored.
Price got into the horror game relatively late. I remember him well for his role as a courtier in A Royal Scandal. Which should really be titled, Tallulah Bankhead Plays Catherine the Great, because that's what it's really about.
But the pacing. Oh the pacing. Ponderous. Epochal. Like a drip of molasses caught in amber on the back of a narcoleptic tortoise.
I blame our short-attention-span, MTV-music-video-quick-edit generation.
But seriously, I've never thought about the pacing of the movie....
Tallulah Bankhead Plays Catherine the Great
My two favorite Tallulah stories are Hitchcock's response to the studio's complaint that she wouldn't wear underwear during the filming of LIFEBOAT (He said he'd like to deal with it, but didn't know which department would handle it - wardrobe, makeup or hairdressing).
The other was her encounter with Chico Marx at a party that I think I've linked to an account of in this thread before (it's a bit too long to summarize).
I'm currently rewatching early 40s Hitchcock ( Foreign Correspondent, Saboteur, etc.) and Lifeboat is up next.
Saboteur is so odd, isn't it? Not really a GOOD movie, but fascinating.
I liked it more than I remembered, but I love all of his innocent-man-on-the-lam (who wins the trust of the beautiful woman) films. See also, Young and Innocent, The 39 Steps, and, of course, North by Northwest.
Also, Saboteur is one of the hardest Hitchcock cameos to spot.
I have tried to watch Saboteur a few times on the late movie, and always end up falling alseep.