I wonder if it wasn't a grow up's vision of a child's fantasy. Are boys that young seriously and practically interested in sex?
I am a little hypocritical asking that, because I certainly was, but I don't think I would have engaged if suddenly given the option. I just liked the stories and pictures.
Oh, I meant the movie as a whole -- living a grownup life, doing things grownups could do, all of that, but not specifically sex.
I don't think I would have engaged if suddenly given the option. I just liked the stories and pictures.
This.
But I wonder if it was grown men putting themselves in boys' shoes for the execution of the fantasy, as opposed to polling kids themselves. Some kids might ask for more of an extension of irresponsibility.
Well, some of it was clearly 13-year-old by stuff -- eating all the junk food, that kind of thing. But some of it was probably filtered through an adult's memory, too.
And there was a lot of lesson-teaching, which I hated.
The odd thing is the script for Big was written by a man and a woman, and it was directed by Penny Marshall.
As a former 8th grade teacher, I would say that he was LESS interested in sex than most boys his age.
the entire film takes place in such a candy-colored universe that I kind of go along with the flow.
This
but as long as we're talking about it.
I don't think Josh realized what was happening and as such he never gave informed consent. Unfortunately for Susan, due to the supernatural circumstances she had no reason to question that she was sleeping with an adult. Could a non-fictional person tell that Josh lacked the comprehension of most adults? I think so.
As a former 8th grade teacher, I would say that he was LESS interested in sex than most boys his age.
I agree, Josh as portayed by Hanks seems a lot younger than 13.
he never gave informed consent.
Not possible for a 13 year old anyway.