Aha! Found it. Thanks, Tom.
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
None of the films along the bottom left side were any good. It's just that TBNBGTJ was the worst compared to the original.
How is CURSE OF THE WERERABBIT a sequel?
They considered LotR: The Two Towers an improvement over the first movie?!?
I thought it was.
Rotten Tomatoes did, which means that fewer people outright didn't like it. But metacritic didn't, which means that those that did like it gave it, on average, lower scores. Which makes sense to me - Fellowship is, imho, a better movie but less viscerally satisfying (fewer exciting action sequences), so I can see some people getting bored by Fellowhip but enjoying Two Towers enough to give it "fresh", if not a super-high score.
The real story on that one is that they both got really good reviews across the board, which is why the difference is so small.
The Two Towers always felt like the draggy middle part to me, although there are some excellent moments in it.
That was my favorite of the three.
I enjoyed all of the trilogy on first viewing, but whenever I rewatch, Fellowship still stands as a great movie even though it's clear that it's a Part I and not freestanding. The Two Towers feels like a 4-hour movie that somehow manages to fit 87 hours into the middle half. And RotK just gags me with all the great white king and savior and destiny and Jesus Sue.
I can forgive RoTK an awful lot for the beacons of Minas Tirith, and the charge of the Rohirrim.