Wash: Well, I wash my hands of it. It's a hopeless case. I'll read a nice poem at the funeral. Something with imagery. Zoe: You could lock the door and keep the power-hungry maniac at bay. Wash: Oh, no, I'm starting to like this poetry idea now. Here lies my beloved Zoe, my autumn flower, somewhat less attractive now she's all corpsified and gross...

'Shindig'


Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Tom Scola - Jan 06, 2011 5:22:48 am PST #12698 of 30000
hwæt

None of the films along the bottom left side were any good. It's just that TBNBGTJ was the worst compared to the original.


Frankenbuddha - Jan 06, 2011 5:44:11 am PST #12699 of 30000
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"

How is CURSE OF THE WERERABBIT a sequel?


Matt the Bruins fan - Jan 06, 2011 5:58:08 am PST #12700 of 30000
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

They considered LotR: The Two Towers an improvement over the first movie?!?


Tom Scola - Jan 06, 2011 5:58:43 am PST #12701 of 30000
hwæt

I thought it was.


Gris - Jan 06, 2011 6:13:49 am PST #12702 of 30000
Hey. New board.

Rotten Tomatoes did, which means that fewer people outright didn't like it. But metacritic didn't, which means that those that did like it gave it, on average, lower scores. Which makes sense to me - Fellowship is, imho, a better movie but less viscerally satisfying (fewer exciting action sequences), so I can see some people getting bored by Fellowhip but enjoying Two Towers enough to give it "fresh", if not a super-high score.

The real story on that one is that they both got really good reviews across the board, which is why the difference is so small.


Amy - Jan 06, 2011 6:15:18 am PST #12703 of 30000
Because books.

The Two Towers always felt like the draggy middle part to me, although there are some excellent moments in it.


Polter-Cow - Jan 06, 2011 6:23:01 am PST #12704 of 30000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

That was my favorite of the three.


amych - Jan 06, 2011 11:42:33 am PST #12705 of 30000
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

I enjoyed all of the trilogy on first viewing, but whenever I rewatch, Fellowship still stands as a great movie even though it's clear that it's a Part I and not freestanding. The Two Towers feels like a 4-hour movie that somehow manages to fit 87 hours into the middle half. And RotK just gags me with all the great white king and savior and destiny and Jesus Sue.


Consuela - Jan 06, 2011 11:58:12 am PST #12706 of 30000
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

I can forgive RoTK an awful lot for the beacons of Minas Tirith, and the charge of the Rohirrim.


Liese S. - Jan 06, 2011 1:35:16 pm PST #12707 of 30000
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

Eowyn!