How does he make it so easy?
I'm sure the Coriolis effect is involved somehow.
'Harm's Way'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
How does he make it so easy?
I'm sure the Coriolis effect is involved somehow.
All guys are easy.
But somehow it still seems tricky. Is it timing, or do we sabotage ourselves?
I am here to state that I do not ever want to eat chocolate covered cat fish.
I have just spent to much time on our children's blog looking for a good version of any poem by Shel Silverstein. I have about two weeks to prove that it does not have to be only last summers post about bugs that are attractive.
Not that anyone seems to care. But really, it doesn't have to be a lame effort. Children's librarians ought to have some idea what a kid might want to look at.
What ... you mean it isn't time to roll your eyes at your co-workers?
Catfish and bacon are delicious. (Cooked catfish). Served with turnip greens and cornbread on the size. (Or maybe hush puppies cooked with the catfish and bacon.) Use some of the juice from the catfish and bacon for the the greens too.
Chocolate cake for desert, maybe with ice cream. Choice of sweet tea, lemonade, iced coffee, beer to drink.
I am guessing that Patrick Stewart could convince anyone to change there mind about many things
and then ... my mind went to Patrick Stewart and chocolate...
did I distract a whole thread?
I have just spent to much time on our children's blog looking for a good version of any poem by Shel Silverstein. I have about two weeks to prove that it does not have to be only last summers post about bugs that are attractive.
That reminds me, I have ordered these books: [link] [link] I am also sorely tempted to get some of the baby outfits, like [link] or [link]
my mind went to Patrick Stewart and chocolate...
And really, does one need much prompting for that?
no
get the I can't read outfit. I'm still laughing