Always read the caption.
::snerk::
use of special effects particularly forced perspective.
Oh, good one.
For my speech class: hmmm...I haven't quite figured that one out yet, but I can come up with something. Vocal expression and energy?
Maybe something about Joss slang usage and how it conveys messages and uses humor? The different communication styles of the characters - Giles v. Buffy v. Anya v. Cordelia?
Tell that to the assclown Superduperfreakanomics authors. Fucktards.
Uggh. Everything I hear about that book confirms that I don't want to read it.
But I thought someone arguing for maturity and civility might, you know, have some.
What? That's just crazy talk.
Tell that to the assclown Superduperfreakanomics authors. Fucktards.
I was very disappointed in Jon Stewart's interview with whichever one of them it was this week - total softball questions. Those guys deserve every piece of hate mail they get.
Tell that to the assclown Superduperfreakanomics authors. Fucktards.
I was very disappointed in Jon Stewart's interview with whichever one of them it was this week - total softball questions. Those guys deserve every piece of hate mail they get.
It is nice, on the other hand, to be able to identify at least 2 men who think all women are whores, so I know who to eviscerate avoid.
Except that only one of them does TV appearances, and I can't remember which one he is! (Levitt, I think. But I doubt I could pick him out of a lineup unless he were holding a copy of the book.)
Except that only one of them does TV appearances, and I can't remember which one he is!
I meant "identify" not so much as in visually, but more as "Ah, because they both put their names on this piece of misogynistic crap, I know how they really feel about women."
but more as "Ah, because they both put their names on this piece of misogynistic crap, I know how they really feel about women."
Somehow that's less satisfying than "identify visually so I know who to throw rocks at if I should ever pass one of them on the street."
I meant "identify" not so much as in visually, but more as "Ah, because they both put their names on this piece of misogynistic crap, I know how they really feel about women."
What did they write? I never read Freakanomics, but I always got the impression it was like a collection of interesting correlations.
What did they write? I never read Freakanomics, but I always got the impression it was like a collection of interesting correlations.
There was a more recent one that I can't find that was basically wondering why more women aren't prostitutes, since it makes good economic sense to be one, but this one from last December was also pretty bad: [link]
