Furthermore, sex workers don't make that kind of money, sure as hell don't get red carpet treatment, and generally don't have much of a choice regarding their careers.
Tell that to the assclown Superduperfreakanomics authors. Fucktards.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Furthermore, sex workers don't make that kind of money, sure as hell don't get red carpet treatment, and generally don't have much of a choice regarding their careers.
Tell that to the assclown Superduperfreakanomics authors. Fucktards.
Yeah, although I shouldn't be surprised that a rude and judgmental person would be rude and judgmental again. But I thought someone arguing for maturity and civility might, you know, have some. Crazy thought, I know. Tep, I know! Freakanomics is now off my wish list, because the one advantage of arguing with college-aged libertarians about that is not having to pay money for the "privilege". Gud, yes, and I know that the Big Answer is that I love it when random people think I'm great, but I usually don't think that I am...I had a spasm of self-respect yesterday and have second-guessed it relentlessly ever since. There's a reason why it wasn't *Ellen* Grayson.
Always read the caption.
::snerk::
use of special effects particularly forced perspective.
Oh, good one.
For my speech class: hmmm...I haven't quite figured that one out yet, but I can come up with something. Vocal expression and energy?
Maybe something about Joss slang usage and how it conveys messages and uses humor? The different communication styles of the characters - Giles v. Buffy v. Anya v. Cordelia?
Tell that to the assclown Superduperfreakanomics authors. Fucktards.
Uggh. Everything I hear about that book confirms that I don't want to read it.
But I thought someone arguing for maturity and civility might, you know, have some.
What? That's just crazy talk.
Tell that to the assclown Superduperfreakanomics authors. Fucktards.
I was very disappointed in Jon Stewart's interview with whichever one of them it was this week - total softball questions. Those guys deserve every piece of hate mail they get.
Tell that to the assclown Superduperfreakanomics authors. Fucktards.
I was very disappointed in Jon Stewart's interview with whichever one of them it was this week - total softball questions. Those guys deserve every piece of hate mail they get.
It is nice, on the other hand, to be able to identify at least 2 men who think all women are whores, so I know who to eviscerate avoid.
Except that only one of them does TV appearances, and I can't remember which one he is! (Levitt, I think. But I doubt I could pick him out of a lineup unless he were holding a copy of the book.)
Except that only one of them does TV appearances, and I can't remember which one he is!
I meant "identify" not so much as in visually, but more as "Ah, because they both put their names on this piece of misogynistic crap, I know how they really feel about women."
but more as "Ah, because they both put their names on this piece of misogynistic crap, I know how they really feel about women."
Somehow that's less satisfying than "identify visually so I know who to throw rocks at if I should ever pass one of them on the street."
Gud, yes, and I know that the Big Answer is that I love it when random people think I'm great, but I usually don't think that I am...
What?