You mentioned working at Stanford and living in/near Oakland though--that would be a hell of a commute. You should move to this part of the bay instead.
Yeah, I considered that. Which part of the bay are you at, again?
Buffy ,'Dirty Girls'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
You mentioned working at Stanford and living in/near Oakland though--that would be a hell of a commute. You should move to this part of the bay instead.
Yeah, I considered that. Which part of the bay are you at, again?
that would be a hell of a commute
My DH did the commute for a year from Berkeley to Palo Alto, and it was 2 hours each way on public transportation. He wasn't much better off in a car.
Dear God, so much ~ma to everyone around. Really.
J, one of my co-workers that I adore, said, "Hey - I'm going to send you another work order, that cool?" It was, so I went to give the thumbs up.
And flipped her off.
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH ME??
Nothing, IMHO. It's also can be interpreted as a good thing. I think.
And now: why the hell every time I quote the claim that there can't be great richness if there ain't great poverty people think I'm referring to zero-sum, and not to the law of conservation of energy?
Sigh. And they call themselves professors.
Which part of the bay are you at, again?
I am in Belmont, which is roughly half way between SF and Palo Alto. If you are thinking Silicon Valley for jobs, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Mateo or Redwood city would be good. A fair number of people who work in my office live in SF as well.
And now: why the hell every time I quote the claim that there can't be great richness if there ain't great poverty people think I'm referring to zero-sum, and not to the law of conservation of energy?
I know the latter is a law of physics and the former something to do with economics, but then I'm stumped (I was never very good at either subject). What were you referring to in this discussion with your professor(s)?
What were you referring to in this discussion with your professor(s)?
A bunch of things. That doesn't really matter, actually. I see why they think I might be talking about the zero sum (the "result" of a game stays the same - kind of like the average. I don't know, I just Googled it yesterday after too many people dismissed me with that statement), but I'm talking about something a lot more basic than economics, dammit.
I'm talking about physics. The scale of value and the value of the value may differ over time, but the energy won't. So I'm not claiming that it'll be zero sum game, but that if a process suddenly "ceased" of being, it didn't really disappeared - the energy of it just went somewhere else.
I just don't have any idea why suddenly people think I know something about economics. If I had have, I'd wear nicer cloths, God dammit.
I have been flu shot. Here's hoping for no side effects.
{{{Sparky}}} Health~ma to you and baby K.
Health~ma Sparky and Seska and Connie and whoever else can use it which is probably all of us to some extent.
Must go out into the world and get cat food and dog food and people food. Would rather stay in by the fire, but afeared of the cats taking matters into their own claws.
anti-flu~ma to all!
Aims, thank you for that story about hand tourettes. I laughed so loud it sounded like a bark.